On Thu, 07 Jun 2007 17:08:41 +0200, Jon Escombe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
> ----- "Dan Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> > Attaching a new version of my patch, this checks whether a private
>> key file is configured for the connection before attempting to read a
>> password from the keyring. I believe this should suit both of the
>> above 802.1X configuration types..
>>
>> Wouldn't this not change the behavior for Tomas?  Since his config
>> doesn't show a private key file, it seems like your patch won't change
>> behvior for him.
>>
>> I guess we should get him to test the patch first and see :)
>>
>> In any case, I've committed your fix since it's obviously correct.  I
>> added a bit to make sure we free the private_key_file variable since
>> that's actually allocated memory.
>>
>> Dan
>>
>
> Thanks,
>
> I believe Tomas is using 6.4, which doesn't work (for him) because it  
> always tries to get a password from the keyring. 6.5 includes a patch to  
> never get a password from the keyring (which I'm assuming would work for  
> Tomas - but breaks the private key password scenario). This *should* now  
> be the best of both worlds  ;)
>
> Regards,
> Jon.
> _______________________________________________
> NetworkManager-list mailing list
> NetworkManager-list@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
I am afraid I will not be able to confirm this (although I think ou are  
right)  since it does not compile with my version of NM (0.6.4):
applet-dbus-info.c: In function ‘nmi_dbus_get_key_for_network’:
applet-dbus-info.c:193: error: ‘NM_AUTH_TYPE_LEAP’ undeclared (first use  
in this function)
applet-dbus-info.c:193: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported  
only once
applet-dbus-info.c:193: error: for each function it appears in.)
I tried to install the current svn, but it did not work for some reason  
(no idea what reason).
I found the patch  
(http://mail.gnome.org/archives/networkmanager-list/2006-July/msg00034.html)  
that introduces LEAP into NM, but it does not work with my source anyway  
since it is far too huge.
I hope it work anyway.
Sorry and regards,
Tomas


_______________________________________________
NetworkManager-list mailing list
NetworkManager-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list

Reply via email to