Joel Goguen wrote:
> I have a need for it, and I imagine it's a common one.  I have a
> wireless network at home, and I put the laptop to sleep and head to my
> university.  When I get there, I have to wait sometimes minutes for
> the list to refresh and my campus network to appear so NM can attempt
> to connect to it.  Or I can open a terminal and manually restart NM,
> but that's not something a common user should be expected to do IMO.
> When I first get to campus I still see all the networks I can see from
> my house, even though none of them are anywhere near the campus.
> After a few minutes of waiting, during which I'm checking the applet
> list at least once every 30 seconds, the list finally refreshes and NM
> connects to my campus network.  This doesn't seem very user-friendly
> to me.
>   

What distro are you using?  I put my laptop to sleep between work and 
home and it connects to each network right away when it wakes up.

I've never had a problem, both with Fedora 6 and 7.
>
> On 10/11/07, Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>   
>> On Thu, 2007-10-11 at 18:08 +0300, Joan B. Moreau wrote:
>>     
>>> Ok, but it is just a pain in the *ss this bug, and everybody complains.
>>>
>>> Please, rather than saying "I disagree", maybe propose an alternative,
>>> because it is really annoying bug.
>>>       
>> We already discussed alternatives on this list.  First, NM should scan
>> quite quickly after dropping the menu down, as long as NM has not
>> scanned within the last 20 seconds.  Currently that may not be the case,
>> it might push off the scan for 20 seconds.  This is a case of a bug that
>> should be fixed (if it exists).
>>
>> Furthermore, I don't believe that it's that much of a burden to check
>> the menu twice.  Can you refresh my memory as to what situations
>> explicitly scanning for networks is necessary?  The applet should be
>> kept simple, additional functionality that doesn't fit in the applet can
>> certainly be farmed out to other tools that are not the applet or NM.
>> The applet should cover 90% of all users needs 90% of the time.  It
>> should _not_ cover 100% of all users needs 100% of the time.  There are
>> some features that just won't be implemented.  I believe explicitly scan
>> requests fit in that last 10%.  I may be able to be convinced otherwise.
>>
>> Dan
>>
>>     
>>> Thanks in advance
>>>
>>> Dan Williams wrote:
>>>       
>>>> On Thu, 2007-10-11 at 17:20 +0300, Joan B. Moreau wrote:
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>> I know this has been posted and discussed already, but this bug is *so*
>>>>> annoying, that I guess I am not the only "simple user" having troubles
>>>>> with that.
>>>>>
>>>>> Would it be possible to fix it ?
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>> I still don't agree that this is the right way to solve the issue.
>>>>
>>>> Dan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>> Thanks a lot
>>>>>
>>>>> JM
>>>>>
>>>>> Joan B. Moreau wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I like the applet but here my request in terms of ergonomy:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Would it be possible to stop triggering a scan when clicking on the
>>>>>> applet (which people do quite frequently to see the available networks)
>>>>>> but rather put a menu item "scan for available networks" that we can
>>>>>> click when one decide so  ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Joan
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> NetworkManager-list mailing list
>>>>> NetworkManager-list@gnome.org
>>>>> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>>         
>> _______________________________________________
>> NetworkManager-list mailing list
>> NetworkManager-list@gnome.org
>> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
>>
>>     
>
>
>   

_______________________________________________
NetworkManager-list mailing list
NetworkManager-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list

Reply via email to