On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 9:12 AM, Martijn Lievaart <m...@rtij.nl> wrote: > On 11/18/2009 09:09 AM, Graham Beneke wrote: >> >> Dan Williams wrote: >> >>> >>> Yeah, looks pretty simple. I wonder if it would be enough to have a >>> checkbox on the IPv6 config page for adding the 6to4 tunnel or >>> something. >>> >> >> I was thinking of an additional option in the 'method' dropdown along >> the lines of "Automatic, 6to4".
Good idea, just remember to make it difficult to enable ipv6 connection sharing with a 6to4 address, Vista is already messing with that too much (we regularly see windows computers advertizing their 6to4 prefix in our network, so they hijack all the AAAA traffic from other computer). >> >> We'll need some extra logic that prevents the 6to4 interface from being >> created when the v4 interface is within RFC1918 space. Would there be >> any other specific restrictions? >> > > I run a 6to4 tunnel on an RFC1914 address. I was pretty surprised it worked, > but it does. You mean, behind a NAT, using the public IP of the gateway? How does your computer get the proto41 packets back? Did you put yourself in DMZ (that's the way I usually it), or is there another trick? regards _______________________________________________ NetworkManager-list mailing list NetworkManager-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list