On Thu, 06 Dec 2012 14:29:26 -0600 Dan Williams <d...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 13:57 -0600, Robby Workman wrote: > > On Thu, 06 Dec 2012 12:11:49 -0600 > > Dan Williams <d...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > All the major distros appear to have been shipping libnl3.x for > > > quite a while already, and it's becoming increasingly difficult > > > to support libnl1.x and 2.x with some of the newer features that > > > are being added to NM like bridging, bonding, vlan, etc. > > > > > > So, given that libnl 3.2.7 has been out for almost a year > > > (2012-01-20), and most major distros are packaging it (Ubuntu, > > > OpenSUSE, Debian, Fedora, Gentoo, Arch), would anyone object to > > > libnl > > > >= 3.2.7 as a build requirement for the next release of > > > >NetworkManager? > > > > > > We've got 3.2.11 in the last stable Slackware, so sure, that's fine > > with us, even if we're not "major" enough to warrant concern ;-) > > Aww, not true. Thanks for the update; by "major" I really mean those > that don't have derivatives. eg Mint would be a derivative distro, > but Slackware would be a major one. I think you meant s,don't have,aren't, but yeah. Even so, no offense was taken - my response was completely good-natured. :-) -RW _______________________________________________ networkmanager-list mailing list networkmanager-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list