Go for it ;)

Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre <mathieu...@gmail.com>
Freenode: cyphermox, Jabber: mathieu...@gmail.com
4096R/EE018C93 1967 8F7D 03A1 8F38 732E  FF82 C126 33E1 EE01 8C93


On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Dan Williams <d...@redhat.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> All the major distros appear to have been shipping libnl3.x for quite a
> while already, and it's becoming increasingly difficult to support
> libnl1.x and 2.x with some of the newer features that are being added to
> NM like bridging, bonding, vlan, etc.
>
> So, given that libnl 3.2.7 has been out for almost a year (2012-01-20),
> and most major distros are packaging it (Ubuntu, OpenSUSE, Debian,
> Fedora, Gentoo, Arch), would anyone object to libnl >= 3.2.7 as a build
> requirement for the next release of NetworkManager?
>
> Dan
>
> _______________________________________________
> networkmanager-list mailing list
> networkmanager-list@gnome.org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
>
_______________________________________________
networkmanager-list mailing list
networkmanager-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list

Reply via email to