Go for it ;) Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre <mathieu...@gmail.com> Freenode: cyphermox, Jabber: mathieu...@gmail.com 4096R/EE018C93 1967 8F7D 03A1 8F38 732E FF82 C126 33E1 EE01 8C93
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Dan Williams <d...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hi, > > All the major distros appear to have been shipping libnl3.x for quite a > while already, and it's becoming increasingly difficult to support > libnl1.x and 2.x with some of the newer features that are being added to > NM like bridging, bonding, vlan, etc. > > So, given that libnl 3.2.7 has been out for almost a year (2012-01-20), > and most major distros are packaging it (Ubuntu, OpenSUSE, Debian, > Fedora, Gentoo, Arch), would anyone object to libnl >= 3.2.7 as a build > requirement for the next release of NetworkManager? > > Dan > > _______________________________________________ > networkmanager-list mailing list > networkmanager-list@gnome.org > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list >
_______________________________________________ networkmanager-list mailing list networkmanager-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list