+Dan
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Ben Chan <benc...@chromium.org> wrote: > Hi Aleksander / Dan, > > Would a transition from 'registered' to 'idle'/'searching' considered a > 'service' loss from the connection manager's perspective (e.g. the service > disappears and then reappears in connection manager)? In practice, a > +CEREG change may not necessarily mean that the service disappears. But I > guess such a glitch can be smoothed out in the connection manager layer > instead of the modem manager layer. I'm happy to update the logic as > suggested if that's the expected behavior. > > Thanks, > Ben > > > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 5:23 AM, Aleksander Morgado <aleksan...@lanedo.com > > wrote: > >> Hey Ben, >> >> Resurrecting old patch... >> >> On 05/03/13 03:37, Ben Chan wrote: >> > This patch changes MMIfaceModem3gpp to differentiate between deferrable >> > and non-deferrable 3GPP registration state updates. Periodic or >> > unsolicited registration state updates are deferrable, while internal >> > updates, e.g. due to modem being disabled, are non-deferrable. >> >> I think that we should *not* defer the registration state update unless >> the modem was connected. This is, if the modem goes from registered to >> idle or searching, that update must be published in the interface right >> away. What do you think? Are you able to update the logic like that? >> >> -- >> Aleksander >> > >
_______________________________________________ networkmanager-list mailing list networkmanager-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
