On Wed, 04 Mar 2015 18:15:43 +0100 Frederik Himpe <frede...@frehi.be> wrote:
> > I still think that NM's behaviour not to touch the interface when it's > up already is counter-intuitive. If I start up NM with a configuration > for eth0, then I _do_ want this configuration to be applied, just like > the distro specific init networking scripts would do. If you don't want > NM to touch an existing interface, then it makes more sense to me to > completely disable NM, or to set this specific interface unmanaged in > NM. > > Maybe this behaviour should be configurable? > I am affected by exactly the same problem, and I completely agree with Frederik. Some improvement here would be highly appreciated. Regards Harri
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ networkmanager-list mailing list networkmanager-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
