Am 29.09.2015 um 13:21 schrieb Jirka Klimes: > On Mon, 28 Sep 2015 09:05:02 +0200 > Olaf Hering <o...@aepfle.de> wrote: >> So my questions: >> Are there known bugs in the cooperation between NM and GNOME? > I don't think there is a known serious issue.
At least GNOME 3.16 is unable to do anything with bridges, except that they can be configured. >> Are bridge devices fully supported? If so, why did NM not bringup >> onboard before configuring bridge? > Yes, bridge configurations are supported. You might got confused by > the fact bringing up a bridge profile does not automatically bring up > its slaves. Basically, you need to connect all slaves (bridge master > will be connected as a dependency). > > But, as you have found there is a new property to influence the > behaviour (connection.autoconnect-slaves). When you set it to '1' you > can activate bridge and its slaves will be activated too. Why is it off by default? What is the point of that behaviour? >> Below is the output of what I configured with 'nm-connection-editor'. >> Why is that output even localized?! > What is the issue with localization/no-localization? Its translated at the wrong layer. But after all, they also gave us ~/Schreibtisch, ~/ビデオ, ~/Público and other odd directory names. So it just makes sense to translate property names as well. I think in the future we will get /proc/версия too... Olaf _______________________________________________ networkmanager-list mailing list networkmanager-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
