On Wed, Sep 30, Dan Williams wrote: > Backwards compatibility, an intention to replicate the behavior of > various legacy network initscripts that had the same behavior (where eg > 'ifup br0' after boot didn't bring up slaves), and because it's not > always the case that you want every single slave configuration that > references 'br0' to be started when br0 starts. In general, NM tries to > be less destructive by default, and allow you to opt into destruction :)
Just to emulate a buggy ifup? Not sure if our ifup even had a mode to leave slaves alone. I suggest to patch the buggy behaviour into the distro packages where needed, instead of having people patch the correct behaviour into the packages.. Olaf _______________________________________________ networkmanager-list mailing list networkmanager-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
