On Mon, 2018-10-08 at 11:45 +0200, Thomas Haller via networkmanager- list wrote: > On Mon, 2018-10-08 at 09:24 +0200, Aleksander Morgado wrote: > > Hey, > > > > I've SIM-PIN blocked one of my SIM cards just by having a gsm > > autoconnected settings with a PIN stored and then PIN not matching > > the > > one in the device. When this happens, NM will try to unlock SIM-PIN > > once, and if it fails it won't try again (good) (*)... until the > > next > > reboot (bad). So, I forgot about this setup and after just a couple > > of > > system reboots got the SIM-PIN blocked, and had to recover it with > > the > > PUK. > > > > Don't know if this kind of thing is done in other kinds of > > settings, > > but could we completely remove the SIM-PIN stored within the > > settings > > if it fails once, so that not even on the next reboot the unlock > > with > > the wrong PIN is attempted? Or is this considered a user error? I'm > > not exactly sure where to draw the line about this issue, I think I > > have pros and cons for both solutions, so just opening the question > > here. > > > > What do you think? > > > > (*) It also doesn't re-ask the user for the PIN right away, still > > need > > to get trace logs as thaller suggested. > > Hi, > > That sounds good to me. > > it's slightly ugly, that activating a profile may result in writing > it > anew to disk. But we already do that when (for example with Wi-Fi), > when the password is wrong and we get a better password from the > secret > agent. While a bit odd that activating a profile may re-write it, it > probably makes sense.
+1 Dan _______________________________________________ networkmanager-list mailing list networkmanager-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
