On 2018-12-10 at 18:16, Thomas Haller wrote:
> you need to have the routes configured properly, which depends on your
> environment.
Maybe should I ask on debian mailing-lists (not that much active, not
sure I can get more relevant help than here)?
> Well, NM should get it right automatically. If it doesn't,
> then you should look at the routes to understand what's wrong.
>
> What gives:
>
> ip route
Currently I’m not at the needed local network, so doing it at home, with
normally configured network, I get:
galex-713@portable:~/doc/comp/src/pharo/opensmalltalk-vm$ ip route
default dev tun0 proto static scope link metric 50
default via 192.168.1.254 dev enp0s25 proto static metric 100
89.234.186.64/27 dev tun0 proto kernel scope link src 89.234.186.82 metric 50
169.254.0.0/16 dev enp0s25 scope link metric 1000
192.168.1.0/24 dev enp0s25 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.1.38 metric 100
When enabling “VPN config > IPv4 Settings > Routes… > Use this
connection only for resources on its network” checkbox, I get this:
galex-713@portable:~/doc/comp/src/pharo/opensmalltalk-vm$ ip route
default via 192.168.1.254 dev enp0s25 proto static metric 100
89.234.186.64/27 dev tun0 proto kernel scope link src 89.234.186.82 metric 50
89.234.186.190 via 192.168.1.254 dev enp0s25 proto static metric 100
169.254.0.0/16 dev enp0s25 scope link metric 1000
192.168.1.0/24 dev enp0s25 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.1.38 metric 100
192.168.1.254 dev enp0s25 proto static scope link metric 100
I’m under Debian GNU/Linux stable, x86 (32bits).
Btw ifconfig:
galex-713@portable:~/doc/comp/src/pharo/opensmalltalk-vm$ /sbin/ifconfig
enp0s25: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
inet 192.168.1.38 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.1.255
inet6 2a01:e0a:54:cb90:dd93:58f3:5591:dc39 prefixlen 64 scopeid
0x0<global>
inet6 fe80::6a50:6fa8:1bc9:b6d1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link>
ether 00:1f:16:14:45:a9 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
RX packets 425383 bytes 300655547 (286.7 MiB)
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 94334 bytes 15010937 (14.3 MiB)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
device interrupt 20 memory 0xf2700000-f2720000
lo: flags=73<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING> mtu 65536
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 255.0.0.0
inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 scopeid 0x10<host>
loop txqueuelen 1 (Boucle locale)
RX packets 1544 bytes 185223 (180.8 KiB)
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 1544 bytes 185223 (180.8 KiB)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
tun0: flags=4305<UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,NOARP,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
inet 89.234.186.82 netmask 255.255.255.224 destination 89.234.186.82
inet6 fe80::918:d4aa:a0ae:2b1d prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link>
inet6 2a00:5884:8305::1 prefixlen 112 scopeid 0x0<global>
unspec 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00 txqueuelen 100
(UNSPEC)
RX packets 12 bytes 1476 (1.4 KiB)
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 12 bytes 808 (808.0 B)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
both interfaces are only present, but only tun0 works in the first case,
and only enps25 works in the second.
_______________________________________________
networkmanager-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
