10.12.2018 21:02, Alexandre Garreau via networkmanager-list пишет: > On 2018-12-10 at 18:16, Thomas Haller wrote: >> you need to have the routes configured properly, which depends on your >> environment. > > Maybe should I ask on debian mailing-lists (not that much active, not > sure I can get more relevant help than here)? > >> Well, NM should get it right automatically. If it doesn't, >> then you should look at the routes to understand what's wrong. >> >> What gives: >> >> ip route > > Currently I’m not at the needed local network, so doing it at home, with > normally configured network, I get: > > galex-713@portable:~/doc/comp/src/pharo/opensmalltalk-vm$ ip route > default dev tun0 proto static scope link metric 50 > default via 192.168.1.254 dev enp0s25 proto static metric 100 > 89.234.186.64/27 dev tun0 proto kernel scope link src 89.234.186.82 metric 50 > 169.254.0.0/16 dev enp0s25 scope link metric 1000 > 192.168.1.0/24 dev enp0s25 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.1.38 metric > 100 > > When enabling “VPN config > IPv4 Settings > Routes… > Use this > connection only for resources on its network” checkbox, I get this: > > galex-713@portable:~/doc/comp/src/pharo/opensmalltalk-vm$ ip route > default via 192.168.1.254 dev enp0s25 proto static metric 100 > 89.234.186.64/27 dev tun0 proto kernel scope link src 89.234.186.82 metric 50 > 89.234.186.190 via 192.168.1.254 dev enp0s25 proto static metric 100 > 169.254.0.0/16 dev enp0s25 scope link metric 1000 > 192.168.1.0/24 dev enp0s25 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.1.38 metric > 100 > 192.168.1.254 dev enp0s25 proto static scope link metric 100 > > I’m under Debian GNU/Linux stable, x86 (32bits). > > Btw ifconfig: > galex-713@portable:~/doc/comp/src/pharo/opensmalltalk-vm$ /sbin/ifconfig > enp0s25: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > inet 192.168.1.38 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.1.255 > inet6 2a01:e0a:54:cb90:dd93:58f3:5591:dc39 prefixlen 64 scopeid > 0x0<global> > inet6 fe80::6a50:6fa8:1bc9:b6d1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link> > ether 00:1f:16:14:45:a9 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) > RX packets 425383 bytes 300655547 (286.7 MiB) > RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 > TX packets 94334 bytes 15010937 (14.3 MiB) > TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 > device interrupt 20 memory 0xf2700000-f2720000 > > lo: flags=73<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING> mtu 65536 > inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 255.0.0.0 > inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 scopeid 0x10<host> > loop txqueuelen 1 (Boucle locale) > RX packets 1544 bytes 185223 (180.8 KiB) > RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 > TX packets 1544 bytes 185223 (180.8 KiB) > TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 > > tun0: flags=4305<UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,NOARP,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > inet 89.234.186.82 netmask 255.255.255.224 destination 89.234.186.82 > inet6 fe80::918:d4aa:a0ae:2b1d prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link> > inet6 2a00:5884:8305::1 prefixlen 112 scopeid 0x0<global> > unspec 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00 txqueuelen > 100 (UNSPEC) > RX packets 12 bytes 1476 (1.4 KiB) > RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 > TX packets 12 bytes 808 (808.0 B) > TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 > > both interfaces are only present, but only tun0 works in the first case, > and only enps25 works in the second. >
You need to explain what "works" means. According to your routing tables, you should have access to local network 192.168.1.0/24 in both cases. At least if I interpret your "need local network" correctly, that is what you need. If this is not what you want, show what does not work in each case. _______________________________________________ networkmanager-list mailing list networkmanager-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
