On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 02:24:09PM -0400, Brian J. Murrell wrote: > On Mon, 2019-06-03 at 14:17 -0400, Brian J. Murrell wrote: > > > > I think I had it set to DEBUG. Let me see if I can reproduce with it > > set to TRACE. > > I have to correct myself. It was set to TRACE. > > > It goes up quite a bit. More indication that it is NM. > > CPU is pegged between NM, journald and one other unrelated process. I > assume without the latter, NM and journald would monopolize the CPU. > > So I don't really know what's going on here. > > But really, given all of the time I have spent on this, the path of > least resistance is probably just rate-limiting the RSes at the router. > > What's a reasonable number of RSes to allow in a given time-frame? > > 1/sec burst 5 seems to be keeping things under control on both the > router and the machine suffering this NM problem.
Sounds ok. Which kernel version do you have on the EL 7.6 machine? B.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ networkmanager-list mailing list networkmanager-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
