From: "Graham Leggett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 4:01 PM
> Chuck Murcko wrote:
>
> > Totally agree. That's why we as mod_proxy commit to cutting a release of
> > the web server too. Then users have what they want, in one package. Or a
> > generic "apache rollup" build with the non-core modules put in.
> > Mod_rewrite too?
>
> (Puts on webmaster hat).
>
> One important thing - there must also be no confusion as to which Apache
> release is the official released version.
>
> If there are apache-x.x.x.tar.bz2, apache-proxy-x.x.x.tar.bz2,
> apache-TLS-x.x.x.tar.bz2, apache-proxy-TLS-x.x.x.tar.bz2 then users will
> be thoroughly confused.
>
> There should be just one single apache-x.x.x.tar.bz released, with
> stable versions of everything included. At worst - a module should
> default to disabled, but these modules should definitely be there.
That is what...
/dist/proxy/
/dist/rewrite/
etc can do for us. After-the-fact releases of these modules can go there.
The full apache will always be in
/dist/httpd/
and that should solve that. It may not be as 'fresh' as the individual
sub-projects, but the webmaster can be assured it works.
Bill
