Greg Ames wrote: > > dean gaudet wrote: > > > > so, like, this zero-copy bucket/filter stuff. > > > > it was supposed to make things faster eh? > > > > It sure slowed things down in my last job...deja vu. > ...zero copy, that is. Q: If it costs 300 "typical" instructions worth of cycles to move a 1500 byte ethernet packet, how many instructions should you spend trying to avoid moving it? A: <left for the reader> It gets worse if you're talking little bitty pieces of HTML. Greg
- memory allocation (was Re: mod_include perf... Cliff Woolley
- Re: memory allocation (was Re: mod_incl... Greg Ames
- Re: memory allocation (was Re: mod_incl... dean gaudet
- Re: memory allocation (was Re: mod... Cliff Woolley
- Re: mod_include performance numbers Marc Slemko
- Re: mod_include performance numbers Cliff Woolley
- Re: mod_include performance numbers Paul J. Reder
- Re: mod_include performance numbers Cliff Woolley
- Re: mod_include performance number... dean gaudet
- Re: mod_include performance nu... Greg Ames
- Re: mod_include performance nu... Greg Ames
- Re: mod_include performance numbers Paul J. Reder
- RE: mod_include performance numbers Jeffrey A. Stuart
- RE: mod_include performance numbers Marc Slemko
- Re: mod_include performance numbers Greg Ames
- RE: mod_include performance numbers Jeffrey A. Stuart
- What Apache admins want (Was: mod_inclu... Andrew Ho
- Re: What Apache admins want (Was: ... Bill Stoddard
- Re: mod_include performance numbers David Reid
- RE: mod_include performance numbers Ian Holsman
- Re: mod_include performance numbers Bill Stoddard