-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 21 August 2002 8:44 am, Patrik Marxer did speak unto the 
huddled masses, saying:

> In the computer magazine c't (http://www.heise.de/ct/) of the
> 2002.07.29 they compare some Linux distributions, namely Suse (8), Red
> Hat (7.2), Debian (3) and Mandrake (8.2). (page 146)

August 16th, 2002 - Mandrake Linux has been LSB-Certified

maybe i misunderstand (can't read the article after all) but if the distro 
is certified, it must be following the standard, yes?

> What causes this bad result in their compatibility tests? Did they (c't)
> make a mistake?

well i am sure it isn't a matter of suse and the united linux fsckup and 
german reporting..........

- -- 
"Psychic Convention. If you belong there, you will KNOW when and where."

shane
Profile at: http://dmoz.org/profiles/shen.html
Proud to be a DMOZ editor since 10-98
Mandrake Users Club Member http://www.linux-mandrake.com/en/club/
Registered linux user #101606 @ http://counter.li.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE9Y8CgBwq+ZwvIN/oRAhz8AJ49p2fppm4C7ITbGi/NJAi7R7Q0ogCeLuKo
rZNejsmByZM0DWuOG7wxHeU=
=cTNb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Reply via email to