-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 21 August 2002 8:44 am, Patrik Marxer did speak unto the huddled masses, saying:
> In the computer magazine c't (http://www.heise.de/ct/) of the > 2002.07.29 they compare some Linux distributions, namely Suse (8), Red > Hat (7.2), Debian (3) and Mandrake (8.2). (page 146) August 16th, 2002 - Mandrake Linux has been LSB-Certified maybe i misunderstand (can't read the article after all) but if the distro is certified, it must be following the standard, yes? > What causes this bad result in their compatibility tests? Did they (c't) > make a mistake? well i am sure it isn't a matter of suse and the united linux fsckup and german reporting.......... - -- "Psychic Convention. If you belong there, you will KNOW when and where." shane Profile at: http://dmoz.org/profiles/shen.html Proud to be a DMOZ editor since 10-98 Mandrake Users Club Member http://www.linux-mandrake.com/en/club/ Registered linux user #101606 @ http://counter.li.org/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE9Y8CgBwq+ZwvIN/oRAhz8AJ49p2fppm4C7ITbGi/NJAi7R7Q0ogCeLuKo rZNejsmByZM0DWuOG7wxHeU= =cTNb -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com