On Sun, 2003-06-08 at 10:11, Poogle wrote: > ><snip> > > When I do cat /proc/bus/usb/devices I get exactly that, except for the > > ProdID that is different from yours e26. My ProdID 0x208f is similar to > > that shown on http://snapscan.sourceforge.net/ so that part seems to be > > in order. > > > > Marco > > O.K. > Make sure that your snape50.bin is executable > > Now from the command line type sane-find-scanner > > within the output from this you should see these lines (I've taken mine and > put the id numbers for the e50 usb in) > > found USB scanner (vendor=0x06bd, product=0x208f) at /dev/usb/scanner0 > found USB scanner (vendor=0x06bd, product=0x208f) at libusb:002:002 > > Now assuming you see this again from the command line type scanimage -L > and you should get this:- > device `snapscan:/dev/usb/scanner0' is a AGFA SNAPSCAN flatbed scanner > > If you don't get all or any of these results post your output here.
Again the output is as you described above. No surprises there. It seems that whatever I do, my scanner is recognized, but that somehow Scannerdrake fails to add it to the list of configured scanners. Every time I try again, it doesn't find any configured scanners, only new ones. Also I noticed that when I boot my machine, configuring the scanner and starting Xsane performs at a normal speed. When I try again, it takes much more time. It seems to me the hardware detection takes much longer. Is this an indication of something familiar? Marco -- Registered Linux user #268279 * This message is composed on a 100% Microsoft free computer *
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
