Title: RE: [newbie] DSL

A slight correction:

Internet access requires an IP address.

My ISP (speakeasy.net) figures that if I'm on the end of my particular DSL line, I must be me, or at least authorized by me to use the 'net.

<soapbox>
usernames and passwords are required for more draconian ISP's who can't understand their hardware well enough to figure out who's on the end of which wire.

</soapbox>

--Matthew

-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen Kuhn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 3:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] DSL


On Mon, 2003-06-09 at 10:53, Aron Smith wrote:
> Anyone Know of a DSL provider here in the Bay Area
> that if not supporting Linux is at least linux Friendly?
> eg. easy to set up under Mandrake

"Linux Friendly" is a really bad term to use. Any ISP that REQUIRES the
usage of linux unsupported hardware is another issue.

Any internet access is dependent on three things - a username, a
password, and SOME means by which to gain and IP address from them.

If you can get a stand-alone ADSL router that allows for you to plug it
into either an ethernet card or into a hub, you can get DSL going.

--
Mon Jun  9 17:50:00 EST 2003
 17:50:00 up 2 days,  3:41,  2 users,  load average: 1.60, 1.36, 0.93
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|            __    __          |kuhn media australia            |
|           /-oo /| |'-.       |http://kma.0catch.com           |
|          .\__/ || |   |      |================================|
|       _ /  `._ \|_|_.-'      |stephen kuhn                    |
|      | /  \__.`=._) (_       | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
-----------------------------------------------------------------
 linux user #:267497 linux machine #:194239 * MDK 9.1 & RH 7.3 
     Mandrake Linux Kernel 2.4.21-11mdk Cooker for i586
-----------------------------------------------------------------
 * This message was composed on a 100% Microsoft free computer *

   Is it a right to remain ignorant?
                  -- Calvin

Reply via email to