lol, I still have a 7.2 web server out there..
11:20am up 121 days, 8:41, 3 users, load average: 0.08, 0.16, 0.12 I'd say that was pretty stable. the only time I reboot it is when it gets a kernel update.. I loved 7.2.... Still, that machine will be replaced soon with a 9.2 machine as soon as I am satisfied that 9.2 is functional and stable enough. regards Franki >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Carroll Grigsby >Sent: Thursday, 7 August 2003 8:29 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [newbie] Mandrakesecure.net > > >On Wednesday 06 August 2003 03:47 pm, Heather/Femme wrote: >> On Wed, 2003-08-06 at 09:48, Ben wrote: >> > On Wednesday 06 August 2003 09:06, madwand wrote: >> > > Good morning (or afternoon) all, >> >> <SNIP> >> >> > > 3. are there any 9.1 installation hiccups I should know >about? My >> > > hardware was OK with 8.0 so I'm assuming it's OK with 9.1. >Is this a >> > > safe assumption to make? >> > > >> > > That's all for now. Thanks for any input you can give. >> > > >> > > madwand >> >> <SNIP> >> >> Installation woes? no... general strangeness? Yes.. KDE tends to screw >> up more often & so does Konqueror in this ver imo. Ditto Xmms. Dunno >> why tho. :| > >Additional proof of the old saw YMMV. Both KDE and Konq have been >rock solid >under 9.1; that wasn't always the case with 9.0. It's been a long >time since >8.0, but my general impression is that each new version since 7.0 >has been a >substantial improvement over the previous one in all areas -- >installation, >performance, and stability. (Well, except for 7.2, and I'm very >much in the >minority on that.) > >Maybe it's a hair dye thing... >-- cmg > > >
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
