On Sat, 2004-01-10 at 10:09, Tom Brinkman wrote:
> On Friday 09 January 2004 03:06 pm, Aron Smith wrote:
> > On Fri, 2004-01-09 at 07:51, Tom Brinkman wrote:
> > > On Thursday 08 January 2004 10:12 pm, Aron Smith wrote:
> > > > > > Any way, next time I will use urpmi.update.
> > > > >
> > > > > I like it better myself.
> > > >
> > > > I  just pulled a dummy ..I did an easy urpmi but left it
> > > > set for 9.2 instead of the 9.1 I was using It updated 682
> > > > packages so I might be running 9.2 now OTH I didn't lose
> > > > any data :-)
> > >
> > >   What does 'cat /etc/mandrake-release' say?   If you are
> > > running 9.2, you should also get the kernel,  'urpmi kernel'
> >
> > It says 9.2 release for fivestar
> 
>     Well good for you, now get the kernel and updates for 9.2. 
> Or.... if you want 10.0, add some cooker sources and disable all 
> others ;>    Seriously, what you did is a good way to update to 
> the next release, but if you do it with urpmi, you should
>  'urpmi urpmi' first, then update.
I'm still too much of a newbie to feel comfortable with the bleeding
edge stuff but thanks for the info :-)


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Reply via email to