On Wed February 25 2004 3:30 pm, deedee wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Feb 2004 10:10:49, Ray Hogaboom wrote:
> >Thanks for the info
> >I am running KDE right now with 6 desktops. This is something I
> >could not do with windows. Yes this is nice. With Windows XP I
> >could open many different apps on one desktop and copy and past
> >between them. But when trouble shooting a computer that is not
> >working you may not be able to display any thing.
>
> I found troubleshooting nonworking computers a big problem with
> ms win and a huge time waster. So far, it has not been a problem
> at all with any of my Linux setups. I'm currently running
> computers with ML 8.1 and 9.1. But I've had ML6.0, RH7.2, and
> RH8.0 systems.
>
> While I've had individual apps crash or need killing, I've not
> had Linux itself crash nor have I ever been unable to continue to
> use the computer. I can't say the same for any ms win system I've
> ever used.
>
> OTOH, I do maintain a Knoppix LiveCD for troubleshooting purposes
> in case an actual system crash should ever happen so that I can
> immediately get back into the box. Also, I've always been fairly
> strict about doing daily backups of user files, and backing up my
> systems whenever I change them in some way. This has been my
> habit with every system I've owned, from my first CP/M PCs in the
> early 1980s.
>
> Unlike ms win where the only completely reliable restoration from
> backups takes place from cloned drives, you can reliably restore
> installed Linux systems from mere copies. Incidentally, I now use
> Linux to make full backups of my ms win systems, and those have
> all been reliably restored.
>
> I should mention that I do not currently maintain, however, any
> XP systems because ms win-platform apps important to me broke
> under XP and won't run on MS NT systems very well at all.
>
> I tar and gzip installed Linux systems (using mc for full
> directories and file roller when I am picking and choosing what
> to save), and have restored them on several occasions when I did
> something I decided would be too difficult for me to easily undo,
> or when I just didn't have any time to troubleshoot because I was
> under a deadline and needed the computer to work immediately.
>
> That's an advantage to Linux that I really appreciate. I install
> on one computer and then take that installed system and copy it
> to as many computers as I need to have the same system (I own and
> operate a small business and have several employees). It takes
> only a few minutes, and a computer is ready to use.
>
> The tarring and gzipping of a full system can take some time,
> especially if you wait to do it all at once, but restoring goes
> very fast. The /dev and /proc directories dynamically restore
> themselves, so you don't have to copy them. I also don't bother
> with /tmp :^).
>
> deedee
> ---
> Registered Linux User #327485
> Visit "WordStar & GNU/Linux"
> http://www.wordstar2.com
> Also, see the WordStar Users Group
> http://www.wordstar2.com/cbabbage/wordstar
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> Find what you are looking for with the Lycos Yellow Pages
> http://r.lycos.com/r/yp_emailfooter/http://yellowpages.lycos.com/
>default.asp?SRC=lycos10
This is some good stuff for me to know

Thanks 
-- 
Ray Hogaboom


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Reply via email to