I am not using 10 yet, so it would be hard for me to check. Could someone check if the problem is a bad signature, or if the error is realy because of a missing key. I think runningTom Brinkman wrote:
On Sunday 20 June 2004 10:32 am, OOzy wrote:
I tried to install libsvga... but it told me bad signature. I clicked yes. Is that a problem? Please see below
urpmi libsvgalib1-1.9.18-1mdk.i586.rpm
The following packages have bad signatures: libsvgalib1-1.9.18-1mdk.i586.rpm: Invalid signature ((SHA1) DSA sha1 md5 (GPG) (MISSING KEY) GPG#78d019f5 NOT OK) Do you want to continue installation ? (y/N) y installing libsvgalib1-1.9.18-1mdk.i586.rpm Preparing... ################################################## 1:libsvgalib1 ##################################################
Bad signatures are almost never a problem. I avoid these warnings by havin the below at the beginning of
/etc/urpmi/urpmi.cfg
{ verify-rpm: 0 downloader: wget }
which ignores signatures and uses wget rather than curl
Thanks Tom - I wish I'd known that before I did urpmi --auto-select than spent ages hitting Y-Return! For some strange reason, the 10.0 Official Cds I burnt all had bad signatures.
Sir Robin
rpm --checksig <RPM name>
should tell you.
Mikkel --
Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for you are crunchy and taste good with Ketchup!
____________________________________________________ Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com ____________________________________________________
