Good old dos, runs so well once you get the memory sorted. I still have a
lot of dos games. Even red alert will run under dos, so will warcraft 2.
----- Original Message -----
From: Jason Ashman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 25, 2000 10:10 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie] Yo
> On Fri, 25 Aug 2000, you wrote:
> > Jason, not to be too personal, but if you can't get Linux to run faster,
> > longer and do all this with less effort in Linux than Windows, you are
the
> > one with the problem, not the O/S you're comparing.
> >
> > I would recommend a steady diet of intelligent, meaningful and thought
> > provoking conversation, followed up with some IN DEPTH proof that you
have
> > Linux experience, and then write something worth reading.
> >
> > I only use Windows (any flavor) because my company GAVE it to me and
their
> > proprietary apps run only on it. Otherwise, I use only software that
> > someone can see where it's broke (i.e. open source software, and this
means
> > free most of the time as well).
>
> This is Jason replying....I didn't write the below statement. I would
NEVER
> EVER EVER EVER EVER EVER EVERdefend Microsoft products. I used DOS until
last
> year when I relented and bought a Win 98 PC, needless to say Win 98 only
lasted
> one year for me. Proof that when you make computers "userfriendly" you
make
> them less reliable. And for the person who wrote that statement below,
try
> fixing a Windows problem in DOS and see how easy it is, since almost ALL
PC's
> don't come with DOS instructions!
>
>
> > >
> > > With Linux you will spend more time trying to get things up and going
> > > than you ever would using windows.
> > > If you want to wast your hartbeats getting LINUX to do stuff that
> > > windows does right out of the box so be it.
>
