On Thu, 14 Sep 2000, Mark Weaver wrote: >Hmmmmmmmm...it took mine 43 seconds to come up. > >On Thu, 14 Sep 2000, Patti Wavinak wrote: > >> I hate to disappoint you or maybe I am just lucky -- I have Star Office >> 5.2 in Linux with 2.2.16 kernel a PII 450 processor and 256M of memory. I >> just timed how long it took to bring it up -- less than 3 seconds after I >> clicked on the icon. I'll stick with Star Office but that's jmho. ;-) >From an article I just read, the speed of the harddisk and throughput of the IDE/SCSI controller contributes a tremendous lot to the speed of loading of this package. Compare those, just for fun, ok? :) Paul -- In a world without walls and fences who needs windows or gates? http://nlpagan.net - ICQ 147208 - Registered Linux User 174403 -=PINE 4.21 on Linux Mandrake 7.1=-
- RE: [[newbie] Athlon thunderbird & ka7-100] Abe
- Re: [[newbie] Athlon thunderbird & ka7-100] Austin L. Denyer
- Re: [[newbie] Athlon thunderbird & ka7-... Austin L. Denyer
- Re: [[newbie] Athlon thunderbird & ... Francois Swanepoel
- Re: [[newbie] Athlon thunderbird &a... Magicshooter1 P
- Re: [[newbie] Athlon thunderbi... Alan Shoemaker
- RE: [[newbie] Athlon thunderbird & ka7-100] Abe
- RE: [[newbie] Athlon thunderbird & ka7-100] Mike & Tracy Holt
- RE: [[newbie] Athlon thunderbird & ka7-100] Patti Wavinak
- RE: [[newbie] Athlon thunderbird & ka7-100] Mark Weaver
- RE: [[newbie] Athlon thunderbird & ka7-100] Abe
- RE: [[newbie] Athlon thunderbird & ka7-100] Abe
- Re: [[newbie] Athlon thunderbird & ka7-100] Austin L. Denyer
- RE: [[newbie] Athlon thunderbird & ka7-100] Mark Weaver
- RE: [[newbie] Athlon thunderbird & ka7-100] Abe
- RE: [[newbie] Athlon thunderbird & ka7-100] patrick
- Re: [[newbie] Athlon thunderbird & ka7-100] john bodanske
- RE: [[newbie] Athlon thunderbird & ka7-100] Abe