Have you looked at the HTML composer that comes w/ Mozilla? I tried it
yesterday just because I had to do a pre-fab demo of what some pages
should look like when done and I didn't feel like cranking out all the
code by hand. W/in about 3 minutes I'd created my tables and placed my
various items within them. I then needed to add some form elements (which
weren't anywhere I could see on the menus) so I flipped over to the raw
HTML and added the form code in another 2 minutes or so. The HTML produced
by Mozilla seems to be a lot cleaner than most programs. After writing the
code in the form elements were recognized right away and could be seen in
the tag-view page or in the preview page.
Overall I think the Composser tool is shaping up into something very
nice. Since usually I write my code by hand I am usually very picky about
such programs but this is a good start. They just need to work on form
element support. :)
*^*^*^*
Have the courage to take your own thoughts seriously, for they will shape
you. -- Albert Einstein
On Sat, 14 Oct 2000, Paul wrote:
> It was Oct 14, 2000, 10:13, when Jeff Malka keyboarded:
>
> >Actually both Bluefish and glimmer seem fine for my purposes. What I miss from
> >Arachnophilia is the ability it had of instantly seeing on its "built in
> >browser" the effect of the code I write. That is an immediate update by
> >clicking one button. If this exists in Bluefish or Glimmer I have not yet
>
> Quanta does that. And very well too.
> The link where to get it is on my linux page at
> http://nlpagan.net/linux.htm
>
> Paul
>
> --
> PRO BOZO PUBLICO
> Support your local clown.
>
> http://nlpagan.net - ICQ 147208 - Registered Linux User 174403
> -=PINE 4.21 on Linux Mandrake 7.1=-
>
>
