Just so you know, I'm not trying to say one is better than the other, or
trying to sell you, or anything...just stating my preference...which could
change in the next twenty minutes ;-)


peace,

Rog
http://www.slammingrooves.com
Registered Linux user #19071

On Fri, 29 Dec 2000, Penndragon wrote:

> Hi Roger
>
>
> > I totally agree...I first started using Linux about 4 months ago, and
> > started out with KDE, as it provided a familiar environment. However,
> > after a while, I started to notice it did take up some resources that
> > could have been put to better use (and this was while I still only had 64
> > meg RAM). Blackbox is faster, and to me just _feels_ more "linux-y."
> >
> >
> > peace,
> >
>
> I must admit the others do seem somewhat faster than KDE. I find the sound
> on startup with KDE breaks up whilst it's fine in most others. Use mostly
> Gnome or Enlightenment for the moment, but still getting the feel for the
> others.
>
> James
> > Rog
> > http://www.slammingrooves.com
> > Registered Linux user #19071
> >
> > On 27 Dec 2000, Michael Scottaline wrote:
> >
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > I find that http://www.gamepc.com usually has a pretty unbiased view
> point
> > > on procs.  Personally I'm really happy with my athlon 900.  Mandrake 7.2
> is
> > > fast as hell after I recompiled everything I use for my processors
> > > architecture.  windowmaker opens from startx (enter) to finished in
> about 2
> > > seconds ;-)
> > > =======================
> > > Blackbox will probably do it in less than one!!  Give it a try if you're
> > > willing to forego eyecandy and like the understated elegance of
> simplicity.
> > > Runs just about any KDE or Gnome app with NO problem.
> > > Mike
> > >
> > > "Always remember that I have taken more out of alcohol
> > > than alcohol has taken out of me."
> > > --Winston Churchill
> > >
> > > ____________________________________________________________________
> > > Get your own FREE, personal Netscape WebMail account today at
> http://home.netscape.com/webmail
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>


Reply via email to