Hey Mark, my email client uses Procmail just fine! ;-) Pine, by the
way...;-p
peace,
Rog
http://www.slammingrooves.com
Registered Linux user #19071
On Fri, 29 Dec 2000, Mark Weaver wrote:
> Nope...you are correct and this fact leaves me wondering how in the world I
> can filter duplicate messages with Kmail filtering technology.
>
> How about it MandrakeSoft? Any ideas? That, or a good solid method of using
> Procmail filtering with Kmail as one would use with Pine.
> --
> Mark
>
> "If you don't share your concepts and ideals, they end up being worthless,"
> "Sharing is what makes them powerful."
>
> Linus Torvalds
>
> On Friday 29 December 2000 13:47, you wrote:
> > I thought I am the only person to receive multiple copies! There were (13)
> > copies of this posting !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> >
> > At 28-12-2000 +1100, you wrote:
> > >On Wed, 27 Dec 2000 22:04, ZER0 FREQUENCY wrote:
> > > > John Arkoulis wrote:
> > > > >Can you please point me at a site (independent) that I can compare the
> > > > > new fast CPUs (P4 1.4, Dual G4, Athlon)
> > > > >Yes I know G4 is a MAC.
> > > > >Which one do you think is best for Linux???
> > > > >Thanks
> > > >
> > > > I personally like AMD. Although linux mostly supports intel. Not
> > > > much change since AMD has intel-compatible microprocessors.
> > >
> > >http://www.tomshardware.com has great PC CPU (i.e. no Mac) reviews. It
> > >recently has done extensive testing on the Pentium 4, comparing it to
> > > other Intel and AMD processors. It generally concludes that AMD chips are
> > > better, since they are significantly cheaper for about the same
> > > performance. The Pentium 4, it says, is difficult to compare to other
> > > CPUs since there are currrently no programmes that can take advantage of
> > > its new instructions. This is particularly important in the floating
> > > point department (i.e. mathematical calculations), where it rates poorly
> > > on current apps that are unoptimised for it. It will be quite some time
> > > before programmes can use the Pentium 4 well, so until then we should use
> > > more conventional CPUs.
> > >
> > >There is nothing wrong with using a Mac for Linux. PowerPC chips, like
> > > Alphas and SunSparcs, are based on RISC technology (Intel and AMD use
> > > CISC), which is typically better for complex mathematical calculations.
> > > If this is not a consideration, then CISC will do.
> > >
> > >In the end, it depends on what you want to do with the CPU that matters.
> > > If you want to run Windows in a dual-boot configuration and/or run many
> > > games, the x86 (i.e. Intel and AMD) architecture would be a better
> > > choice. It also makes installing apps a lot easier (it's easier to find
> > > ready-made i386, i586 or i686 binaries, hence you won't have to compile
> > > code). In this case, I strongly recommend AMD, for the same reasons that
> > > www.tomshardware.com does. If you plan to do much scientific and
> > > mathematical work, then RISC (whether it be PowerPC, Alpha, SunSparc or
> > > something else) is probably better (as long as you can find the
> > > programmes you need).
> > >
> > >--
> > >Sridhar Dhanapalan.
> > > Your mouse has moved. Windows must be rebooted to acknowledge
> > > this change.
>
>
>
>
