At 15:52 18.01.2001 -0500, you wrote:
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Quaylar
>Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 12:09 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: [newbie] local unix-win microlan
>
>
>At 11:17 18.01.2001 -0500, you wrote:
>
> >Assuming your cabling is ok, then it's time to look for trouble with Linux
> >vis-a-vis your ethernet cards.
> >
> >First type in
> >
> >lsdev
>
>
>alright......lsdev.....command not found.....but i know what u are aiming
>at.......so here we go :
>
>---
>
>lsdev not found?
>
>
>Did you perform a full installation?
no, i did a server installation with LM 7.1 because i only have 2x500 MB HD
>---
>
>first : DMA
>
>4: cascade
>
>second : irq´s:
>
>CPU0
> 0: 1192243 XT-PIC timer
> 1: 919 XT-PIC keyboard
> 2: 0 XT-PIC cascade
> 9: 1 XT-PIC HiSax
> 10: 359 XT-PIC eth0
> 13: 1 XT-PIC fpu
> 14: 31822 XT-PIC ide0
> 15: 8 XT-PIC ide1
>NMI: 0
>
>
>third : io´s
>
>0000-001f : dma1
>0020-003f : pic1
>0040-005f : timer
>0060-006f : keyboard
>0080-008f : dma page reg
>00a0-00bf : pic2
>00c0-00df : dma2
>00f0-00ff : fpu
>0170-0177 : ide1
>01f0-01f7 : ide0
>02f8-02ff : serial(auto)
>0300-030f : 3c509
>0376-0376 : ide1
>03c0-03df : vga+
>03f6-03f6 : ide0
>03f8-03ff : serial(auto)
>1400-1401 : HFCS isdn
>f000-f007 : ide0
>f008-f00f : ide1
>
>forth : devices
>
>Character devices:
> 1 mem
> 2 pty
> 3 ttyp
> 4 ttyS
> 5 cua
> 7 vcs
> 10 misc
> 36 netlink
> 43 ttyI
> 44 cui
> 45 isdn
>128 ptm
>136 pts
>
>Block devices:
> 2 fd
> 3 ide0
> 9 md
> 22 ide1
>
>
>fifth : modules
>
>3c509 5964 1 (autoclean)
>hisax 126536 4
>isdn 91604 5 [hisax]
>slhc 4440 1 [isdn]
>
>
>these are all the outputs of cat /proc/*
>
>
>
> >This will show something like this...
> >
> >Device DMA IRQ I/O Ports
> >------------------------------------------------
> >aic7xxx 5 e800-e8fe
> >cascade 4 2
> >dma 0080-008f
> >dma1 0000-001f
> >dma2 00c0-00df
> >eth0 e400-e47f
> >fpu 13 00f0-00ff
> >ide0 14 01f0-01f7 03f6-03f6 f000-f007
> >--- Snip ---
> >
> >Notice the ethernet entry.
> >
> >Make sure you see yours. IRQ does not show up, because I'm using a PCI
>card.
> >
> >Next type
> >
> >ifconfig
>
>
>ok......so this is my ifconfig :
>
>
>eth0 Linkverkapselung:Ethernet HWaddr 00:60:08:71:06:D9
> inet addr:192.168.0.1 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Maske:255.255.255.0
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> Empfangene Pakete:0 Fehler:0 Weggeworfen:0 Überlauf:0 Rahmen:0
> Verschickte Packete:2874 Fehler:0 Weggeworfen:0 Überlauf:0
>Rahmen:2874
> Kollisionen:0 Sendewarteschlangenlänge:100
> Interrupt:10 Basisadresse:0x300
>
>ippp0 Linkverkapselung:Punkt-zu-Punkt Verbindung
> UP PUNKTZUPUNKT RUNNING NOARP MTU:1500 Metric:1
> Empfangene Pakete:0 Fehler:0 Weggeworfen:0 Überlauf:0 Rahmen:0
> Verschickte Packete:0 Fehler:0 Weggeworfen:0 Überlauf:0 Rahmen:0
> Kollisionen:0 Sendewarteschlangenlänge:30
>
>lo Linkverkapselung:Locale Schleife
> inet addr:127.0.0.1 Maske:255.0.0.0
> UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:3924 Metric:1
> Empfangene Pakete:2877 Fehler:0 Weggeworfen:0 Überlauf:0 Rahmen:0
> Verschickte Packete:2877 Fehler:0 Weggeworfen:0 Überlauf:0
>Rahmen:0
> Kollisionen:0 Sendewarteschlangenlänge:0
>
>---
>
>Until you have everything running, why don't you bring down the ppp link,
>just in case you have a routing problem?
>
alright.....let me try......doesnt work.....despite of bringing down the
ippp interface
>---
>
>
> >eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:10:5A:04:36:65
> > inet addr:10.0.0.1 Bcast:10.255.255.255 Mask:255.0.0.0
> > IPX/Ethernet II addr:00105A043665
> > IPX/Ethernet SNAP addr:00105A043665
> > IPX/Ethernet 802.2 addr:00105A043665
> > IPX/Ethernet 802.3 addr:00105A043665
> > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> > RX packets:547913 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> > TX packets:1007164 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> > collisions:403747 txqueuelen:100
> > Interrupt:10 Base address:0xe400
> >
> >lo Link encap:Local Loopback
> > inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
> > UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:3924 Metric:1
> > RX packets:1423 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> > TX packets:1423 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> > collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
> >
> >If you can see your eth0 interface, then Linux knows how to talk to it and
> >it is correctly configured hardware wise. The software configuration might
> >be in error though.
>
>
>hmm------so maybe in sw.....
>
>
> >Post the output of ifconfig see I can see it.
> >
> >Next type
> >
> >dmesg
>
>
>ok..........here is dmesg with all msgs that belong to eth0:
>
> -------------
>eth0: 3c509 at 0x300 tag 1, 10baseT port, address 00 60 08 71 06 d9, IRQ
>10.
> -------------
>3c509.c:1.16 (2.2) 2/3/98 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>ippp, open, slot: 0, minor: 0, state: 0000
>ippp_ccp: allocated reset data structure c1e75800
>eth0: Setting Rx mode to 1 addresses. > this is because i set route in
>rc.local at bootup
>
>---
>
>I thought you said you were using THINNET (10base2) yet Linux reports your
>card set to 10BaseT.
>
>This could well be the problem!
>
>---
argh.....i didnt notice that at all *blame me*, but how do i get linux
recognizing it as 10base2 ?
> >The output from dmesg will include information about your ethernet card
>like
> >this...
> >
> >IPX Portions Copyright (c) 1995 Caldera, Inc.
> >3c59x.c 16Aug00 Donald Becker and others
> >http://www.scyld.com/network/vortex.html
> >eth0: 3Com 3c905B Cyclone 100baseTx at 0xe400, 00:10:5a:04:36:65, IRQ 10
> > 8K byte-wide RAM 5:3 Rx:Tx split, autoselect/Autonegotiate interface.
> > MII transceiver found at address 24, status 786d.
> > MII transceiver found at address 0, status 786d.
> > Enabling bus-master transmits and whole-frame receives.
> >
> >Post it as well.
> >
> >Notice that dmesg displays not only the connection speed but also the type
> >of port the card is connected to.
>
>
>mhm......it does.....i see
>
>
>
> >It could very well be that Linux is trying to utilize an AUI or 10BaseT
>port
> >on your LAN card instead of the thinnet port.
> >
> >Normally this is set up using a DOS software utility. You may have to run
> >the software utility for your LAN card that selects the thinnet port, and
> >sets the IO and IRQ for the card.
>
>
>
>argh......old nic.....3com 3c509.....may have to search on the net for this
>tool.....but it seems that the settings are ok , hm ?
>
>---
>
>Not from what dmesg reported above
>
>---
>
>
>
>yeah.....this is my routing table :
>
>Kernel IP Routentabelle
>Ziel Router Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
>Iface
>192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
>127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo
>0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 U 0 0 0
>ippp0
>
>
>i issued a "add route default ippp0" in rc.local.....so shouldnt there be a
>"default" unter "Ziel (Destination)" for ippp0 ?
>
>---
>
>Yes, but your ippp0 link is unconfigured (it has no IP address associated
>with it yet) so no routing to an unknown IP...
>
>You should really bring it down until you have the machines pinging each
>other.
>
>---
>
>
>
> >These are the most problematic for most users.
> >
> >route -n
> >
> >Kernel IP routing table
> >Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
> >Iface
> >255.255.255.255 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0
>eth0
> >10.0.0.0 10.0.0.1 255.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0
>eth0
> >10.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0
>eth0
> >127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo
>
>
>
>why do u have 3 routes for eth0 ?.......do i need them ?
>
>---
>
>Yes, line one is the broadcast address, line two defines the route to my
>local network as being THRU my "local" ethernet adapter, and line three
>assigns the route to my local LAN as being via the computer itself.
>
>192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0
> 0
>eth0
>192.168.0.0 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0
>eth0
>
>is what you should have.
>
> >Remember that your Linux box connected to the internet, should have ROUTING
> >active but the "default gateway" should be blank.
>
>
>---
>
>It looks like Linux is trying to use the 10BaseT port instead of the 10Base2
>port on your card.
>
>You'll need the software configuration utility from 3Com to change this...
>
>You should be able to find it at their web site.
will have a look at it and report u wether i was successful or not........
>-JMS
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]