We seem to have the same idea if you refer to one of my posts earlier. If we can't do this on -list , lets do it off-list. Charles, Since I am guilty of "flaming you" and contradicting myself about posting OT, I again, offer my apologies. While I do still think there is a difference about that topic and this, I no less humbly admit my own contradictions. (and change of heart) I hope that the majority of the poster to this list have not already been kicked off. I hope the show of hands support OT, but if not, I would be more than happy to join an off-list list. After all...silence is not a coping mechanism. On Thursday 13 September 2001 20:30, Charles A. Punch wrote: > I have refrained from posting OT since Dennis HAVLIK posted about > kicking people off the list. However, that was not the only one reason. > The other is that I have had arguments in the past about posting OT, and > I see some of the same people who flamed me about my opinion are now > posting OT themselves, because this is not just another OT, this is > different. This topic about the nation's tragedy is something that most > people can't seem to ignore. Someone posted calling for a show of hands. > I vote to allow OT. Someone else inquired if everyone had stopped > because of Dennis HAVLIK's post. With all due respect to Mr. HAVLIK, the > main reason I have refrained recently, is out of respect to those who > feel so strongly against posting OT, that they have gone somewhat off > the deep end emotionally and resorted to name calling. I don't want to > be responsible for driving someone to that extreme. We have enough of a > problem. The purpose of discussing the tragedy, is to try to work > through it, not to create more of a problem. Unity is more important > than my piddling "freedom of speech." I offer an invitation to anyone > who wants to discuss this, or anything else off list, until this is > cleared up ( and I'll try to actually post off list this time). I have a > great deal of respect for everyone on this list, even those whom I have > had differences with in the past. At the same time I don't wan to stick > a gig in someone who is already hurting emotionally. > > ShalomOut > Chal > > Elder PCUSA > Registered Linux user 3217118 > > Shalom does not mean peace (in the sense of absence of conflict). It > means completeness and fulfillment. It could possibly be understood as > "peace of mind." > > Paraphrased from the exeGesis Paralell Bible, an Aramaic translation and > transliteration by exegete Herb Jahn ---------------------------------------- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; name="message.footer" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Description: ---------------------------------------- -- Jennifer #221463 Yahoo IM: jlynn2k #include <wisdom.h> void ignorance (it offers no value)
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com