Ed Tharp wrote:

>On Tuesday 01 January 2002 05:38, you wrote:
>
>>Hi Mark,
>>
>>Well, if devfsd would have worked properly the devices would have been
>>created dynamically.
>>You should disable the devfsd alltogether as it f&cks up in every way.
>>You do this by taking out the devfsd mention from your lilo.conf file.
>>After editing run 'lilo' off course.
>>Then reboot. If you use cmd MAKEDEV you can re-create the missing devices.
>>
>>
>>I have scsi & ide buses and devfsd fucked up big time for me too.
>>
>
>so how do you REALLLY feel about devfs? 
>
It sucks for now, it's a pain in the ass, it's too early to use it ...

>
>I have not tried "taking out the devfsd mention from your lilo.conf file."
>I have tried changing the "mount" to "nomount" and rebooting, and have tried 
>changing it back to "mount" (running /sbin/lilo, all as root, and rebooting)
>
Have tried, have tried... Yes, and then?

> 
>I have found that if you need a thing to load up each time you boot (kinda 
>like adding it to autoexec.bat in dos 5.x +) you could add it as one of the 
>last lines to the file "/etc/rc.d/rc.local" and save that file (also as root)
>
where does this come from? How does it relate to the previous. What is 
your point?

Guy


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Reply via email to