On Thursday, July 13, 2006, 3:24:29 PM, Dan LaBine wrote:

DL> rikona wrote:
>> DL> Asking this question is like asking to start a flame war.
>> 
>> Didn't mean to do that.....

DL> No, I realize that you didn't mean to, I just figured that all the
DL> lurkers would jump in on this thread and voice their opinions,
DL> which  would lead to an argument. It happens for the strangest of
DL> reasons.

I've noticed...... :-))

>> Of note is that the MD site does NOT list any Via chipsets for
>> 2006. Is there something that makes them not work with 2006?

DL> Either MD forgot to mention them or they just work so well that it
DL> wasn't worth putting on the site, but I have absolutely no
DL> problems with Asus motherboards, Via chipsets and Linux.

Good news. I'm leaning heavily in that direction...

DL> On a side note, do yourself and your friend a BIG favour. No
DL> matter which CPU you go with, buy a tube of 'Arctic Silver'
DL> thermal paste and put a layer of it between the CPU and the heat
DL> sink on the CPU cooling fan.

I do use that, but thanks much for the suggestion - it is good stuff.

DL> Also, you should be able to get your supplier to mount the CPU and
DL> Ram before you take it with you and they can do a test boot to
DL> make sure  that everything works before you take it home. It might
DL> cost you a few dollars (more often than not, they won't charge you
DL> anything for that), but you'll know that they work and there won't
DL> be any question about  whether you damaged anything during the
DL> assembly.

Depends on the place. In some, that would probably result in destroyed
hardware ["pass me the hammer so I can get the CPU in right"]. Others
are OK and will do the boot test, a good idea.

>> She's not (yet) an intensive user, but seems to be getting into it
>> more and more. Perhaps watching the first few DVD's will do it. :-)

DL> Yup. Very true. I recommend a P4 at least, with 1 MB of CPU cache
DL> as a minimum. That way she won't be in a hurry to upgrade and the
DL> system will do a very nice, smooth job of DVD playback. Multimedia
DL> apps can suck the life out of a system almost as fast as onboard
DL> video adapters, so get  her a decent CPU and save yourself some
DL> hassles.

Thanks for the good viewpoint.

>> I wasn't thinking of that solution, although she was using an S3
>> card, IIRC, and doesn't complain. Without gaming, it would seem as
>> though it is ok - but when video comes, it might be a rather
>> different story.

DL> Trust me. It will become a major issue when she tries to do more
DL> and  more with this new system. It's a natural thing when you see
DL> your new  computer running much faster - you just gotta try it out
DL> and push the  limits. Video is where a lot of the work on a PC
DL> takes place, more than most other things. A cheap NVidia card with
DL> 128 MB's of ram will run her about $60.00 Canadian and will make a
DL> huge difference in how fast the  system runs, especialy when she's
DL> running several apps in the background while watching a DVD or
DL> working with Gimp or something similar.

You make a good point. She probably will run video when she finds out
she can. Might as well do it now, or I'll have to do it later. :-))

>> That was a very nice short summary. Again, many thanks....
>> 

DL> NP Rikona. Glad to help.

You have been quite helpful, and I - oops - we appreciate that!

-- 

 rikona                            mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



____________________________________________________
Want to buy your Pack or Services from Mandriva? 
Go to http://store.mandriva.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrivaclub.com
____________________________________________________

Reply via email to