ael wrote: > Dave F. wrote: > > >> I maybe wrong, but isn't that just for descriptive purposes only? The >> wiki page makes no mention of it rendering. >> > > I am sure that someone will say "tag for meaning/description, not for > renderers". It is right, of course. But when renderers get odd, one > cannot always be pure :-) > > That said, I started using width on rivers when I mapped a footpath > along the bank of a river and the renderers showed it inside the river! > The default rendering width seemed to assume a very major river. In this > case, width=n communicates essential information to the renderers. > > ael Thanks to all who replied
The render did, eventually, show a width to the river using the width= tag, unfortunately only in Osmarender. The area I created to signify the wharf (Waterway=canal) shades fully in blue with Mapnik, but with Osmarender only the outline is shown. A bit annoying. Cheers Dave F. _______________________________________________ newbies mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/newbies
