On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Rich Milburn <[email protected]> wrote:
> IMHO, not overkill.
> Here's one I did :)
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=18.7655295431614&lon=99.0305283665657&zoom=17

Nice junction, Rich.  Your situation is a little different as you are
looking at junctions with flyovers, while Austin was looking at
grade-level junction.

I would also recommend using tertiary_link, etc, for the flyovers in
your junction.  Perhaps also consider splitting some of the flyovers
and designating bridge=yes, only for the portion that is a bridge.  (I
don't see aerial imagery but imagine that the SB to WB bridge might be
shorter than you show).

Have fun!

_______________________________________________
newbies mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/newbies

Reply via email to