US Image Is Worsening Worldwide: Review

The image of the United States in the eyes of the people worldwide has
been deteriorating in recent years. In the Middle East, anti-American
sentiment is rising high; in Southeast Asia, anti-US marches are staged
one after another; in the ROK and Japan, there have been frequent
demonstrations against US soldiers' disgusting conducts. Even in its
European allies, a "sentiment of alienation" from the old "Uncle Sam"
has bred and grown among local people. In a recent demonstration in
Denmark, on placards held up by people were written these words: "Bush,
the biggest terrorist in the world!" 

Over the past two years, the favorability ratings for the United States
among the people in 20 out of 27 countries have fallen, according to the
result of a survey conducted by the US-based Pew Research Center for the
People & the Press between July and October. The problem has drawn
attention from US policy-makers. US defense officials recently revealed
that the Pentagon was discussing whether an "image project" should be
kicked off in certain nations to reverse the negative view on the
country. 


America, like a double-faced person, is willful and haughty 
Many experts told the reporter that most foreigners still like, or even
admire, the cultural, political and economic ideas of the United States,
but they dislike its foreign policy, nor do they submit themselves to
the direction of a "bullying" overlord. 

After traveling over 30 countries in the past 20-odd years and
interviewing numerous ordinary people, American reporter Mark Hertsgaard
made a profound analysis of the worldwide anti-US trends of thought in
his newly published book "The Eagle's Shadow". He was once told by a
South African taxi driver that South Africa was very much influenced by
America and the local people liked very much American music and clothing
and admired the American style of life: beautiful house, big car and
lots of bank-notes. However, talking about underworld gangs in South
African cities, the driver said that the gangs are divided into two
kinds, one called "young Yankees" and the other "ugly Yankees", the
former dress themselves up like Americans and the latter look like
Americans when they shoot. 

Many Chinese-Americans seem sharing the same feeling: America is like a
double-faced person. On one side it is fine, but on the other side it is
arrogant. Perhaps it is just the "fineness" that drove American
arrogance to an uncontrollable extent. 

Director of the East Asia Studies Institute under Columbia University
divided the anti-American sentiment into three cases. First, Islamic
countries and many poor developing countries resent the US foreign
policy. The United States is not willing to extend generous help to poor
countries as are European countries, it invariably integrates its
so-called aid with its interests and objective of value. In the Middle
East, the US policy is always eyed as partial to Israel. Second, its
allies dissatisfied with the US way of handling things. Although US
policies have support from most of its European allies, the American way
of handling matters, however, is unacceptable to them because America is
invariably too arrogant. Third, the anti-US sentiment comes from the
ROK, Japan, Kuwait and other countries. Though they are beneficiaries,
the people there have a fairly strong anti-US sentiment, this is mainly
due to the social and legal problems caused by US troops stationed
there. From the combination of the three cases, people can see a United
States acting willfully and arrogantly. 


Prejudice Affects American views on the world
A professor with Columbia University once told the reporter that the
Americans always think themselves as the world "No.1", and "No.1" is
meant by saying "Yes" or "No", so they care nothing about what others
may think or feel. It is precisely because of this carefree attitude
that has deepened others' indignation. 

Prejudice is affecting the American view on the world, as well as
deepening the world's resentment against America. Referring to anti-US
sentiment, the US-based National Review magazine said in a recent
article that "Who cares about how the Arabs look upon the United States?
Don't forget that after the 'September 11' incident, many Arabs took to
the street and celebrated". Author of the article forgot that it's not
only Arabs who cherish the counter-US feelings, even most Europeans,
their faithful allies, hold that the "September 11" event is connected
with the US's foreign policy and its strike against Iraq is fight for
oil. There are even people who compared the United States with the
fascist Germany. 

Perhaps only those Americans who frequently travel the world can feel
that the image of their country is not as nice as they once imagined.
According to the result of a survey conducted by National Geographic
Society, only 18 percent Americans know the geographic location of
Afghanistan, 87 percent Americans aged between 18 and 24 cannot find out
Iraq on a world map, and it is most difficult to believe that one-fourth
of the Americans do not know where the Pacific Ocean is. Such an
attitude of the Americans toward the outside world constitutes an
important reason why foreigners dislike the country. News Week once
reported a strange phenomenon: each time the United States or another
Western country suffers a terrorist attack, urban and rural citizens in
Asia vented their indignation against the United States, instead of the
terrorist organizations which should have been responsible for the
attack. 


Globalization doesn't mean Americanism
In his book, "Anti-Americanism", published in 1996, Professor Hollander
argues that anti-Americanism is not like anti-Nazism, because emergence
of the latter is fully grounded, but the United States is the "world
most free, democratic, prosperous, generous, diversified and tolerant
state". If a country, into which thousands upon thousands of people from
all over the world rushed in a continuous stream, is being widely
detested, then there must be enormous irrational elements in the trend
of thoughts. Hollander recently indicated that anti-Americanism is in
vogue because it meets people's need of venting their grumbles. It
emerges against the background of some problems brought about by
modernization, and modernization is represented by the United States. It
seems, according to Professor Hollander, that the United States has been
taken as a vent. But what he failed to make it clear is that the
globalization represented and encouraged by the United States is not in
the interests of all countries, nor is it a cure-all medicine. Not to
mention that the United States has its selfish calculations on many
issues. 

The US has all along been seeking new enemies after the Cold War, and
now it has finally found one: terrorist. Arias, Nobel peace laureate and
former president of Costa Rica, said that terrorist attack is very
dangerous, but this is not the only menace. The world is also plagued by
illiteracy, the deterioration of environment, illness and hunger. It's a
pity, these threats, instead of decreasing, have even increased. But the
United States fails to shoulder the leader's responsibility to eliminate
these menaces. 


US seems to have fallen into abyss of anxiety
The United States has lost much in terms of its image on the Iraqi
issue. If Bush hadn't been anxious to put forward the "pre-emptive
strike" strategy and attack Iraq, said a politics professor with the
Colgate University, he wouldn't have invited so strong aversion from
across the world. Some traditional allies, in particular, feel very
uncomfortable, they worry that many ideas and principles handed down
from the 20th century for dealing with international problems are thus
ruined. 

As it wants to be the world leader, the United States should both enjoy
rights and shoulder responsibilities, said HaoYufan, and as a leader,
you cannot invariably force others to follow you by pointing your gun at
them. The United States not only should have powerful military strength,
but also be able to stand at a moral height, so that it has a strong
appeal. That is the so-called "soft strength" put forward by some
American scholars. 

However, after the "September 11" incident, the country seemed to heave
been plunged into an abyss of anxiety. Terrorist attacks, economic
slowdown, shattered stock bubbles, the scandal of false enterprise
accounts--all these have fully unveiled the ugliness of American-style
capitalism. The United States is increasingly worried about its security
and possible challenges. Such being the case, it puts stress on military
strength and is busy seeking enemies all the time. 


"The world should take the US as example"
In the eyes of some US decision-makers, the United States represents the
interests of the world people as well as the best values and systems,
therefore it should be taken as example by the whole world. The
terrorists who strike the United States are setting themselves against
the world. While analyzing NATO's future development trends, some German
media once pointed out, now the United States wants to turn NATO into a
military organization fighting terrorists and "rogue countries", which
will rush to wherever there are enemies as the United States claims.
Then does NATO remain as it was before? Is it practicable for an
organization based on common defense to make a sudden turn without
regard for wishes of the people of its member countries? 

One year has passed since the "September 11" event, and people see that
the United States has been trying to turn its strategic goal into that
of its allies, even that of the whole world. Some American experts even
said the anti-terrorism war would possibly last a century. Can people
have no worry if the anti-terrorism war really becomes a strategic means
for America to push its own concept of values and American-style
democracy? 



By PD Online Staff Member Li Heng 
http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/200212/29/print20021229_109261.html





                                   Serbian News Network - SNN

                                        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

                                    http://www.antic.org/

Reply via email to