Why Kosovo declaration is untenable 

 
<http://www.bdafrica.com/index2.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=6376&pop
=1&page=0&Itemid=5821> Print

 
<http://www.bdafrica.com/index2.php?option=com_content&task=emailform&id=637
6&itemid=5821> E-mail

 


Written by Vuc Jeremic    


 

Reuters

Protesters burn an Albanian flag in front of Ukraine’s ministry of foreign
affairs demanding Kiev should not recognise Kosovo’s declaration of
independence.

March 12, 2008: THE international system that has brought unprecedented
prosperity to the world since 1945 is based on rules that apply without
exception.

This system is supposed to protect the basic, legitimate national interests
of every country, whether rich or poor, strong or weak. Its binding
principles include the sovereign equality of states, the respect for the
territorial integrity and the inviolability of internationally recognised
borders.

Yet on February 17, the Serbian province of Kosovo, which has been under
United Nations administration since 1999, unilaterally declared independence
from my country. This illegal act has, unfortunately, been recognised by the
Bush administration and some European countries including Britain, France
and Germany. 

Others in Europe — including Greece, Romania and Spain — have withheld
recognition, as have most other leading global and regional players,
including Brazil, China, Egypt, India, Israel, Russia and South Africa. 

As things stand, the number of countries that will recognise an independent
Kosovo will plateau at around 40, leaving it unrecognised by a vast majority
of the close to 200 members of the United Nations. This includes, of course,
the Republic of Serbia. 

A peaceful demonstration of close to half a million people in Belgrade last
week condemned this act of illegal secession. 

Unfortunately, a few hundred hooligans attacked several embassies, including
that of the United States, and looted stores; they even attacked my
ministry. Our government has condemned these acts, and will prosecute the
offenders. 

The case against recognition is based not only on the Security Council’s
1999 resolution reaffirming Serbia’s sovereignty over Kosovo, but also
founded on the view that the international system has, as a result of this
hostile act by the Kosovo Albanians, become more unstable, more insecure and
more unpredictable. 

Here’s why. Recognising the unilateral declaration of Kosovo’s independence
from Serbia legitimises the doctrine of imposing solutions to ethnic
conflicts. It legitimises the act of unilateral secession by a provincial or
other non-state actor. It transforms the right to self-determination into an
avowed right to independence. It legitimises the forced partition of
internationally recognised, sovereign states. 

It violates the commitment to the peaceful and consensual resolution of
disputes in Europe. It supplies any ethnic or religious group that has a
grievance against its capital with a playbook on how to achieve its ends. It
even resurrects the discredited cold-war doctrine of limited sovereignty. 

A historical injustice is being imposed on a European country that has
overcome more obstacles since we democratically overthrew Slobodan Milosevic
in October 2000 than most other nations have in a much longer time. 

Recognising Kosovo means saying, in effect, that Serbian democracy must be
punished because a tyrant — one who committed heinous deeds against the
Kosovo Albanians in the 1990s — was left unpunished. Such misplaced revenge
may make some feel better, but it will make the international system feel
much worse. 

To act out of a false moral imperative to right a supposed historical wrong
will contribute neither to international security nor to the region’s
prospects of European Union membership. 

It is time to take a step back and examine the damage done.  If we can find
a creative way to step back from the abyss that is Kosovo’s unilateral
declaration of independence, we could not only salvage the credibility of
the international system, but even strengthen it through a re-commitment to
its basic principles. 

Some will say that it’s too late to put the genie back in the bottle. I
don’t believe that’s true, because it’s never too late to forge a prosperous
future for all stakeholders to share. 

What is absolutely certain is that trust needs to be rebuilt and values must
be reaffirmed. The way forward lies in coming together and securing an
agreement between the two parties: a negotiated, compromise solution to
Kosovo’s future status that addresses the legitimate right to broad
self-governance for Kosovo’s Albanians, while preserving a democratic Serbia
that is whole and free, integrated into Europe, and engaged with a world set
aright through prudent statecraft. 

The legitimacy of the international system hangs in the balance.

Jeremic is the foreign minister of Serbia. 

  
© Copyright 2000-2007 by Nation Media Group. All rights 

Attachment: image001.png
Description: Binary data

Attachment: image002.png
Description: Binary data

Reply via email to