http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/views/story.html?id=5e81c3f4-15ed-4cfa-8
250-13627c41dd27&p=1
Truth and immigration
Rather than climbing over each other promising to increase the number of
immigrants to Canada, party leaders should acknowledge that levels are
already too high
James Bissett
Citizen Special
Thursday, September 18, 2008
CREDIT: Chris Mikula, The Ottawa Citizen
There is only one reason why our political parties push for high immigration
intake and that is they see every new immigrant as a potential vote for
their party.
We sometimes complain about politicians who don't do what they promise to do
after they get elected. Ironically, it is sometimes much better for the
country when some of these promises are broken.
Let's hope, for example, that the promises made by our political leaders to
raise immigration levels and provide more money for immigrant organizations
are not kept.
Either our political leaders do not know that Canada is facing an
immigration crisis or they care more about gaining a few more so-called
"ethnic voters" than they do about telling the truth about immigration.
Canada is taking far too many immigrants and the leaders of all the parties
are promising to take even more.
There are already close to a million immigrants waiting in the backlog to
come here. They have all met the requirements and by law must be admitted.
There is also a backlog of 62,000 asylum seekers before the refugee board
and even if these are not found to be genuine refugees most will be allowed
to stay. In addition, there are between 150,000 and 200,000 temporary
workers now in the country and here again it is unlikely many of them will
ever go home.
Despite these extraordinary numbers, the Harper government wants to raise
the immigration intake next year to 265,000. The Liberals and the New
Democrats have said they want even more, as much as one per cent of our
population, or 333,000 each year.
These are enormous numbers and even in the best of times would place a
serious burden on the economy and on the already strained infrastructure of
the three major urban centres where most of them would end up.
Let's face the facts -- when there is a turndown in the world economy and
dire predictions of serious recession or worse this is not the time to be
bringing thousands of newcomers to Canada. In July of this year Ontario
alone lost 55,000 jobs -- so what is the rationale for more immigration? The
fact is there is no valid rationale. There is only one reason why our
political parties push for high immigration intake and that is they see
every new immigrant as a potential vote for their party. This is not only
irresponsible; it borders on culpable negligence.
There are few economists today who argue that immigration helps the economy
in any significant way. Studies in Canada since the mid-1980s have pointed
out that immigration has little impact on the economic welfare of the
receiving country and similar studies in the United States and Britain have
reached the same conclusion. Comprehensive studies by George Borjas, the
world's most renown immigration economist at Harvard have shown that
immigration's only significant impact is to reduce the wages of native
workers.
Our politicians justify their desire for more immigrants by raising the
spectre of an aging population and tell us immigration is the only answer to
this dilemma, and yet there is not a shred of truth to this argument.
Immigration does not provide the answer to population aging and there is a
multiplicity of studies done in Canada and elsewhere that proves this.
Moreover, there is no evidence that a larger labour force necessarily leads
to economic progress. Many countries whose labour forces are shrinking are
still enjoying economic buoyancy. Finland, Switzerland and Japan are only a
few examples of countries that do not rely on massive immigration to
succeed.
Productivity is the answer to economic success, not a larger population.
Most Canadians assume that our immigrants are selected because they have
skills, training and education that will enable them to enhance our labour
force but only about 18 to 20 per cent of our immigrants are selected for
economic factors. By far the bulk of the immigrants we receive come here
because they are sponsored by relatives or because of so-called humanitarian
reasons and none of these have to meet the "points system" of selection.
This is why over 50 per cent of recent immigrants are living below the
poverty line and why they are not earning nearly the wages paid to
equivalent Canadian workers.
It also explains why a study published this year by professor Herbert Grubel
of Simon Fraser University revealed that the 2.5 million immigrants who came
to Canada between 1990 and 2002 received $18.3 billion more in government
services and benefits in 2002 than they paid in taxes. As Prof. Grubel
points out, this amount is more than the federal government spent on health
care and twice what was spent on defence in the fiscal year of 2000/2001.
Isn't it time our party leaders were made aware of this study?
In the discussions about immigration we never hear from our political
leaders about the serious environmental problems caused by the addition of
over a quarter of a million immigrants each year. Most of our immigrants are
coming from developing countries of Asia where their "ecological footprint"
is tiny compared to the average Canadian but within months of arrival here
the immigrant's footprint has increased to our giant size.
We have already experienced the impact mass migration has had on the health,
education, traffic, social services and crime rates of our three major urban
centres. It may be that cutting the immigration flow in half would do more
than any gas tax to help reduce our environmental pollution.
If immigration is to be an issue in the election campaign then let us insist
that the real issues be discussed and that our politicians contribute more
to the debate than promising higher levels and more money to immigrant
groups. Canadians and immigrants deserve better.
James Bissett is a former executive director of the Canadian Immigration
Service.
© The Ottawa Citizen 2008
