http://english.ruvr.ru/2009/11/24/2399341.html

Voice of Russia
November 24, 2009

Russia against change in Bosnia-Herzegovina constitution
Yevgeny Kryshkin 

Russia insists it is unacceptable to impose constitutional reforms on
Bosnia-Herzegovina by other countries. This was stated by Russia's
ambassador to the United Nations Vitaly Churkin addressing a UN Security
Council meeting. 

The US and the European Union are pressing Bosnia-Herzegovina to carry out
constitutional reforms and work out their own amendments to the constitution
and linking their adoption with granting the country the candidate status
for EU membership. Bosnia-Herzegovina is a confederation under the Dayton
agreement of 1995 that put an end to the almost four-year conflict. It
consists of the Moslem-Croatian Bosnia-Herzegovina Federation and Republika
Srpska, which enjoy a high level of independence in political, economic and
other areas. 

Washington and Brussels are dissatisfied with this situation and insist on
forming a central government in Bosnia-Herzegovina. Officially, this demand
is substantiated by the improper function of the existing system based on
the representation of the three-state-forming people - Croats, Serbs and
Bosnian Moslems. In reality the demand has far-reaching aims, says the head
of the Centre for the Study of the Contemporary Balkan Crisis in Moscow,
Elena Guskova. 

All reforms are aimed at centralizing Bosnia-Herzegovina and uniting all its
integral parts, says Elena Guskova. Post-Dayton Bosnia-Herzegovina exists as
a state where the ethnic rights of all people are honoured. For one,
Republika Srpska has formed a strong state. Currently, all ethnic groups in
Bosnia-Herzegovina have been set several conditions if they wish to join the
EU which they must meet. These groups must first and foremost found a state
where there are no ethnic divisions and no Republika Srpska, said Elena
Guskova. 

No matter what the motive of the authors of reforms is, clearly carrying out
the reforms can only destabilize the situation and dead-lock a Bosnian
settlement. In fact, the politicians of Bosnia-Herzegovina are aware of
this. In October, the leaders of seven Bosnian parties, who discussed the
issues at the military base Butmir in Sarajevo, rejected the
American-European proposals. 

The citizens of Bosnia-Herzegovina should determine their future only by
themselves. Consequently, there is a possibility of reviewing the Dayton
agreement on the basis of a consensus by Republika Srpska and the
Moslem-Croatian Federation and all the ethnic groups living there, says
Vitaly Churkin. These should achieve consensus voluntarily and without
arm-twisting and imposing schemes thought up outside the country. 



__,_._,___

Reply via email to