attinente, la lettera di Giulia Pastorella al Foglio di oggi:
... serve una
riflessione sugli impatti emotivi che queste
tecnologie hanno sullo sviluppo affettivo.
Per questo, insieme al senatore Lombardo,
ho proposto emendamenti alla legge sulla
tutela dei minori nella dimensione digita-
le, ora al Senato, per limitare la memoria
dei chatbot che interagiscono con i minori.
Conservare le conversazioni solo per pochi
giorni riduce il rischio di creare attacca-
mento “simulato”, illusione di un rappor-
to reale.
--
mi sembra un'ottima iniziativa
On 14/11/25 11:49, J.C. DE MARTIN wrote:
Riguardo al breve video in allegato (fonte: https://x.com/CalumWorthy/
status/1988283207138324487?s=20), l'ottima Caitlin Jonhstone reagisce
come segue.
Juan Carlos
*Caitlin Johnstone *
https://x.com/caitoz/status/1989099985737310714?s=20
I hate this. I hate this. IhatethisIhatethisIhatethisIhatethis.
These predatory AI corporations are trying to convince us that (A)
chatbots are people, and (B) a "person" is nothing more than a certain
appearance with certain speech tendencies. They are attacking the very
philosophical and moral underpinnings of our entire society stretching
back through millennia of human civilization, and they are doing it for
money.
It's not just this company. I've seen multiple Character AI users report
that when they try to delete their account they get a message saying,
"Are you sure about this? You'll lose everything. Characters associated
with your account, chats, the love that we shared, likes, messages,
posts and the memories we made together."
They're actively encouraging their users to view their chatbots as
living people with real feelings in order to keep them emotionally roped
in and addicted to their product.
Their agenda is profoundly destructive, both in the short term and in
the long term. In the short term they are deliberately trying to instill
a new kind of psychological disorder in their users which causes them to
suffer from the delusion that a computer program is a real person, and
in the long term they threaten to unravel our society's entire
understanding of what a person is.
What's going to happen to a society that starts viewing programmable
software products the same way it views human beings? What happens to a
society where Elizabeth the single mother of three who just lost her job
has the same value as Claire™ from RealHumanAI™, or "Alice", the AI
wankbot that some guy stores in his broom closet? What happens when a
government killing a chatbot company with an antitrust initiative is
seen as identical to a government committing genocide? What happens to
human rights? What happens to human dignity? What happens to the way we
think and feel about ourselves, as individuals and as a collective?
A person is not merely an appearance with a certain face which makes
sounds in a specific voice and tends to behave in a certain way. A
person is SOMEONE. A conscious, thinking, feeling human being with hopes
and dreams and fears and passions. A human organism which arose on this
planet through ancestry and evolution over unfathomable depths of time.
An indigenous terrestrial which is inseparably interwoven with the
entirety of our biosphere, walking upon this earth having a subjective
experience of all its beauty and wonder using senses specifically
adapted for this environment.
They're trying to manipulate us into believing we are much, much less
than what we are, just so they can become billionaires and
trillionaires. They are attacking the most sacred parts of us for the
stupidest reasons imaginable. They are enemies of our species. What they
are doing must be rejected with severe revulsion.
--
You can reach me on Signal: @quinta.01 (no Whatsapp, no Telegram)
