John et al.,
 
For many purposes related to bird monitoring, recording a best-guess
species ID is better than nothing. Assigning a confidence to the ID
would enhance the value, though it will be hard to assign objectively. 
 
However, for NFC that were digitally recorded (unlike field
observations), we also have the option to archive the actual recording
of the flight call, so that any future analyst can go back and revisit
the identifications and make their own classifications. I hope that at
some point in the not-too-distant future, we'll be able to work out some
sort of a web-based database where people like yourselves who are
recording NFC can upload all the clips, along with the metadata (time,
date, location, etc.). That would allow for much greater value than
simply a list of what species were recorded on each date. Presumably
most of you are keeping at least the sound clips of each call you
detected, so that when such a database is created, you can upload them
all. 
 
Andrew Farnsworth and I co-chaired a workshop at the North American
Ornithological Congress in August about acoustic monitoring, and there
was a lot of interest from multiple groups to create these types of data
bases, both for flight calls as well as other types of recording
projects. We hope that over the next year or two we'll be seeing a lot
of progress.
 
Charles M. Francis, PhD
Manager, Bird Population Monitoring

Canadian Wildlife Service, Environment Canada 

1125 Colonel By, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0H3
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
Telephone 613-998-0332
Facsimile 613-998-0458
 

________________________________

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of John
Kearney
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 12:32 PM
To: 'Erik Johnson'; 'Nocturnal Flight Call ListServe'
Subject: RE: [nfc-l] ID of NFCs



Very good points Erik. Thank you for your response.

 

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Erik
Johnson
Sent: September 20, 2012 13:26
To: Nocturnal Flight Call ListServe
Subject: Re: [nfc-l] ID of NFCs

 

John, I recall a post on this list serve a few years back (Mike Lanzone
in PA?) where it was mentioned that Savannah Sparrows were a common NFC,
but were rarely encountered on the ground.  I suspect given the
diversity of habitats that our migrants use, it would be really tricky
to make direct comparisons because your ground counts are so dependent
on the habitat you are in.  But it might work for certain species that
you sample well on the ground, as you say.  And of course, something
like eBird that compiles observations across sites (and skill levels,
and all the other biases of bird watching), starts to get at a more
regional picture of what is expected when.  I like the idea of
probabilistic identification (and FYI, Ted Floyd blogged about this on
his ABA blog a couple months back - interesting concept).  Maybe eBird
contains the "prior" that one needs to generate probabilities around
flight call complex "identification"?

 

Erik Johnson

S Lafayette, LA

ejohn33 AT lsu.edu

ejohnson AT audubon.org

 

 

 On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 11:07 AM, John Kearney
<[email protected]> wrote:

        The discussion today reminds me of a similar train of thought
that I've been pondering lately. Namely, in today's world of birding and
ornithology, we require a high of degree of certainty when it comes to
documenting the classification of our observations to the species level.
Basically, photographic proof has become almost essential for rare
species. When it comes to night flight calls, the certitude of species
identification becomes very problematic. I am concerned that we might
apply similar standards to NFC identification as to bird observations.
Should we rather think of NFC IDs more in terms of probabilities and
error bars than certitude? I personally feel this approach is worth
pursuing if we wish to make more of a contribution to bird migration and
aeroecology. For example, where I in live in Nova Scotia, the "zeep"
warblers can be boiled down to about 6 species that are difficult to
identify. Thus while I might not be able to distinguish the NFC of a
Yellow Warbler from a Blackpoll Warbler, it is very probable that this
type of call in early August is a Yellow Warbler and such a call in
early September is a Blackpoll Warbler. This breakdown of all the zeep
warblers into probability categories is much more useful, I believe, for
understanding regional migration patterns than having them all lumped as
zeep warblers because we can't be certain of their identification to the
species level. How we calculate these probabilities is another question.
I have been doing stop-over transects in areas close to a recording
station. Although this analysis is not completed, I sense that there may
be some interesting correlations to be made between the species
composition of nocturnal migration and stop-over areas within a certain
time frame.

        --

        NFC-L List Info:

        Welcome and Basics <http://www.northeastbirding.com/NFC_WELCOME>


        Rules and Information
<http://www.northeastbirding.com/NFC_RULES> 

        Subscribe, Configuration and Leave
<http://www.northeastbirding.com/NFC-L_SubscribeConfigurationLeave.htm> 

        Archives:

        The Mail Archive
<http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.html> 

        Surfbirds <http://www.surfbirds.com/birdingmail/Group/NFC-L> 

        BirdingOnThe.Net
<http://birdingonthe.net/mailinglists/NFCL.html> 

        Please submit your observations to eBird
<http://ebird.org/content/ebird/> !

        --

 

 

--

NFC-L List Info:

Welcome and Basics <http://www.northeastbirding.com/NFC_WELCOME> 

Rules and Information <http://www.northeastbirding.com/NFC_RULES> 

Subscribe, Configuration and Leave
<http://www.northeastbirding.com/NFC-L_SubscribeConfigurationLeave.htm> 

Archives:

The Mail Archive
<http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.html> 

Surfbirds <http://www.surfbirds.com/birdingmail/Group/NFC-L> 

BirdingOnThe.Net <http://birdingonthe.net/mailinglists/NFCL.html> 

Please submit your observations to eBird
<http://ebird.org/content/ebird/> !

--

--
NFC-L List Info:
Welcome and Basics <http://www.northeastbirding.com/NFC_WELCOME> 
Rules and Information <http://www.northeastbirding.com/NFC_RULES> 
Subscribe, Configuration and Leave
<http://www.northeastbirding.com/NFC-L_SubscribeConfigurationLeave.htm> 
Archives:
The Mail Archive
<http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.html> 
Surfbirds <http://www.surfbirds.com/birdingmail/Group/NFC-L> 
BirdingOnThe.Net <http://birdingonthe.net/mailinglists/NFCL.html> 
Please submit your observations to eBird
<http://ebird.org/content/ebird/> !
--

--

NFC-L List Info:
http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NFC_WELCOME
http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NFC_RULES
http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NFC-L_SubscribeConfigurationLeave.htm

ARCHIVES:
1) http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.html
2) http://www.surfbirds.com/birdingmail/Group/NFC-L
3) http://birdingonthe.net/mailinglists/NFCL.html

Please submit your observations to eBird:
http://ebird.org/content/ebird/

--

Reply via email to