It probably should stay. ntirpc is intended to be useful to more than Ganesha, and this seems like a useful feature for potential users. It's not the codepaths called by Ganesha, so it doesn't cause any problems.
Daniel On 03/09/2017 09:21 AM, William Allen Simpson wrote: > Anybody have any objections to my removing the ntirpc version? > > Clearly, this is done in RPCAL/nfs_duprec.c, so why is it also in > libntirpc/src/svc_dg.c? > > According to blame, Matt, Malahal, and Frank have all worked on this, > but not since early 2015. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Announcing the Oxford Dictionaries API! The API offers world-renowned > dictionary content that is easy and intuitive to access. Sign up for an > account today to start using our lexical data to power your apps and > projects. Get started today and enter our developer competition. > http://sdm.link/oxford > _______________________________________________ > Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list > Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Announcing the Oxford Dictionaries API! The API offers world-renowned dictionary content that is easy and intuitive to access. Sign up for an account today to start using our lexical data to power your apps and projects. Get started today and enter our developer competition. http://sdm.link/oxford _______________________________________________ Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel
