> CMAL is dead. There wasn't enough interest in it, and the majority of it's > features are provided by whatever clustered filesystem is backing Ganesha.
CMAL is dead, long live CMAL! What came out of the CMAL effort was a couple things: 1. The dBus interface we have for clustering (takeip, releaseip, entergrace) is needed by everyone, no need to make that part pluggable 2. Everyone at the time was using shared storage for client recovery information 3. Clusterized DRC seemed like too big a thing On the other hand, the pluggable backend for the client recovery information is really just part of the CMAL ideas under a new name... > There are plans underway to extend the FSAL APIs to support more features > required by HA. It's unlikely that we'll ever be able to run active/active > without a framework like pacemaker/corosync, but it's not impossible. > > Note that storhaug for Gluster does do active/active, so it's certainly > possible. Work for Ceph is still in progress. > > Daniel Frank --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel
