On 10/20/17 1:44 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
On 10/20/2017 01:32 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
Do you regularly import fixes from the glibc code into libntirpc?
I don't know. That's a question for the ntirpc developers (cc'd)
This isn't a fix "from the glibc code", this is a fix because of a
newly discovered bug in glibc().
Yes, there are other workarounds for changes to glibc code, compared
with ancient library practices....
auth_unix.c:
/* According to glibc comments, an intervening setgroups(2)
* call can increase the number of supplemental groups between
* these two getgroups(2) calls. */
rpc_callmsg.c:
/* in glibc 2.14+ x86_64, memcpy no longer tries to handle overlapping areas,
* see Fedora Bug 691336 (NOTABUG); we dont permit overlapping segments,
* so memcpy may be a small win over memmove.
*/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list
Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel
