On 3/15/18 10:23 AM, Daniel Gryniewicz wrote:
Can you try again with a larger count, like 100k? 500 is still quite small for a loop benchmark like this.
In the code, I commented that 500 is minimal. I've done a pile of 100, 200, 300, and they perform roughly the same as 500. rpcping tcp localhost count=100 threads=1 workers=5 (port=2049 program=100003 version=3 procedure=0): mean 46812.8194, total 46812.8194 rpcping tcp localhost count=500 threads=1 workers=5 (port=2049 program=100003 version=3 procedure=0): mean 41285.4267, total 41285.4267 100k is a lot less (when it works). tests/rpcping tcp localhost -c 100000 rpcping tcp localhost count=100000 threads=1 workers=5 (port=2049 program=100003 version=3 procedure=0): mean 15901.7190, total 15901.7190 tests/rpcping tcp localhost -c 100000 rpcping tcp localhost count=100000 threads=1 workers=5 (port=2049 program=100003 version=3 procedure=0): mean 15894.9971, total 15894.9971 tests/rpcping tcp localhost -c 100000 -t 2 double free or corruption (out) Aborted (core dumped) tests/rpcping tcp localhost -c 100000 -t 2 double free or corruption (out) corrupted double-linked list (not small) Aborted (core dumped) Looks like we have a nice dump test case! ;) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel
