100k is a much more accurate measurement. I haven't gotten any crashes since the fixes from yesterday, but I can keep trying.
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 12:10 PM, William Allen Simpson <william.allen.simp...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 3/15/18 10:23 AM, Daniel Gryniewicz wrote: >> >> Can you try again with a larger count, like 100k? 500 is still quite >> small for a loop benchmark like this. >> > In the code, I commented that 500 is minimal. I've done a pile of > 100, 200, 300, and they perform roughly the same as 500. > > rpcping tcp localhost count=100 threads=1 workers=5 (port=2049 > program=100003 version=3 procedure=0): mean 46812.8194, total 46812.8194 > rpcping tcp localhost count=500 threads=1 workers=5 (port=2049 > program=100003 version=3 procedure=0): mean 41285.4267, total 41285.4267 > > 100k is a lot less (when it works). > > tests/rpcping tcp localhost -c 100000 > rpcping tcp localhost count=100000 threads=1 workers=5 (port=2049 > program=100003 version=3 procedure=0): mean 15901.7190, total 15901.7190 > tests/rpcping tcp localhost -c 100000 > rpcping tcp localhost count=100000 threads=1 workers=5 (port=2049 > program=100003 version=3 procedure=0): mean 15894.9971, total 15894.9971 > > tests/rpcping tcp localhost -c 100000 -t 2 > double free or corruption (out) > Aborted (core dumped) > > tests/rpcping tcp localhost -c 100000 -t 2 > double free or corruption (out) > corrupted double-linked list (not small) > Aborted (core dumped) > > Looks like we have a nice dump test case! ;) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel
