mre=more tests :) On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 9:07 PM, Tuna Toksöz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1 so we can take care of this problem. Now, all the tests are passing and > looks like we are lacking of mre. > > > On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 9:05 PM, Chad Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Jay, >> >> Could you provide a test case for your specific scenario and create a JIRA >> for it? >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 12:45 PM, Jay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> >>> Chad, >>> >>> This revert has broken some of my HQL queries that previously worked. >>> Particularly those queries where I am ordering by an aggregate value. >>> It seems to be putting the asc or desc in the select portion of the >>> SQL statement rather than the order by portion. I wanted to use this >>> revision since it is required for the latest NH.Linq fixes in >>> nhcontrib, but I can't if it breaks other things. >>> >>> - Jay >>> >>> On Oct 30, 8:36 am, "Chad Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> > It includes 99 files because the new version of tortoisesvn updates the >>> svn >>> > merge info for all files when you do a reverse merge. If you click on >>> the >>> > files - there are no changes to most of them. I don't know why it does >>> that >>> > -- it makes the commit more convoluted I think. >>> > >>> > On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 5:30 AM, Fabio Maulo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> wrote: >>> > > Hi. >>> > > In theory the revision 3880 is a revert of the NH-1090 fix. >>> > > Somebody know why it include 99 files of all projects of the trunk ? >>> > >>> > > -- >>> > > Fabio Maulo >>> >> >> > > > -- > Tuna Toksöz > > Typos included to enhance the readers attention! > -- Tuna Toksöz Typos included to enhance the readers attention!
