In any case, we will take care of the issue but it may take sometime. On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 12:56 AM, Jay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've been trying to figure that one out. I've been using the trunk, > and the last time I compiled nhibernate prior to the latest revision > is sometime before October 20th (that's the last commit of that file > to my SCC). I tried trying some of the revisions prior to October > 20th, but couldn't find any that make the test pass. I know it works, > because the test passes against my compiled revision, I just have no > way of figuring out what revision it was. You guys might want to think > about changing your AssemblyInfo.cs to use the SVN revision number for > the final number in the version number. > > On Nov 3, 5:00 pm, "Tuna Toksöz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It didn't work prior to revert and prior to resultTransformer thing. > > Definitely a bug, but not related to the revert. > > Can you tell me which revision are you trying? > > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 11:06 PM, Jay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Yes, I am currently using an older revision where the query works. > > > > > On Nov 3, 3:55 pm, "Tuna Toksöz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Thanks. So you say that it was working before the revert thing? > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 10:50 PM, Jay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > The issue and test is athttp://jira.nhibernate.org/browse/NH-1556 > > > > > > > On Nov 3, 2:05 pm, "Chad Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Jay, > > > > > > > > Could you provide a test case for your specific scenario and > create a > > > > > JIRA > > > > > > for it? > > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 12:45 PM, Jay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Chad, > > > > > > > > > This revert has broken some of my HQL queries that previously > > > worked. > > > > > > > Particularly those queries where I am ordering by an aggregate > > > value. > > > > > > > It seems to be putting the asc or desc in the select portion of > the > > > > > > > SQL statement rather than the order by portion. I wanted to use > > > this > > > > > > > revision since it is required for the latest NH.Linq fixes in > > > > > > > nhcontrib, but I can't if it breaks other things. > > > > > > > > > - Jay > > > > > > > > > On Oct 30, 8:36 am, "Chad Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > It includes 99 files because the new version of tortoisesvn > > > updates > > > > > the > > > > > > > svn > > > > > > > > merge info for all files when you do a reverse merge. If you > > > click > > > > > on > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > files - there are no changes to most of them. I don't know > why > > > it > > > > > does > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > -- it makes the commit more convoluted I think. > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 5:30 AM, Fabio Maulo < > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi. > > > > > > > > > In theory the revision 3880 is a revert of the NH-1090 fix. > > > > > > > > > Somebody know why it include 99 files of all projects of > the > > > trunk > > > > > ? > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > Fabio Maulo > > > > > > -- > > > > Tuna Toksöz > > > > > > Typos included to enhance the readers attention! > > > > -- > > Tuna Toksöz > > > > Typos included to enhance the readers attention! > -- Tuna Toksöz Typos included to enhance the readers attention!
