Man, RSS feeds... puf...http://sourceforge.net/projects/nhibernate/ It is there since long time.
GitHub, as GoogleCode, as bitbucket, may show clones hosted in the same place but the idea behind DVCS does not mean "distributed but hosted all in the same place". btw... and again... you have 90% work done. Download the mirror, convert it to Git, put it wherever you want and start patching it. Somebody will follow your activity, will clone your fork and everybody happy. If you need it, just do it. On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 7:44 PM, Mauricio Scheffer < [email protected]> wrote: > Yes, GoogleCode *did* implement this properly with their Mercurial > support. There's a "create a clone" button and a clones tab which > lists all clones of the original repository. But the discussion was > about sourceforge, and I don't see these things on sourceforge. > This "project network" I was talking about is not just hope, on github > for example I can see all forks (e.g. > http://github.com/jagregory/fluent-nhibernate/network/members > ) and see what people are doing on those forks (e.g. > http://github.com/jagregory/fluent-nhibernate/network ). You can also > get an RSS feed of all activity within a project network. I believe > bitbucket implements similar features. > That's what makes github a "hub", it concentrates all forks in one > place, making managing the project easier . > > -- > Mauricio > > On Jun 4, 7:24 pm, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote: > > but you can see it in GoogleCode and btw we can require it to > sourceforge... > > at the end a fork/clone is a fork/clone in my PC, in your PC, in > GoogleCode, > > in CodePlex, or whatever you want host it. > > > > About "project network being able to see what everyone else is working > on" > > IMO is a merely hope.... > > or you have proposed something in our JIRA ? > > > > On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 7:06 PM, Mauricio Scheffer < > > > > > > > > > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > If I may chip in, moving to a DVCS is not just about moving the code > > > to another repository. > > > It's also about people being able to fork easily and everyone on the > > > project network being able to see what everyone else is working on. > > > Github and Bitbucket were built from the ground up around these > > > concepts. I might be wrong but I don't see any fork button or fork > > > list on Sourceforge projects using git (e.g. > > >https://sourceforge.net/projects/gitextensions/ > > > ). I couldn't find any projects using a mercurial repository on > > > sourceforge. It looks as if DVCS was bolted on as an afterthought. > > > Without this fork management thing, a huge part of DVCS is lost. > > > > > -- > > > Mauricio > > > > > On Jun 4, 11:14 am, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > SourceForge gives support to any thing we want and, over all, > SourceForge > > > is > > > > one of the most important and historical piece of OSS world. > > > > We have no strong reason to move NH sources somewhere else (at least > so > > > > far). > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Lorenzo Melato < > > > [email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > Have you evaluated bitbucket.org as Mercurial hosting ? > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Lorenzo Melato > > > > >http://blogs.ynnova.it/lorenzomelato > > > > > > -- > > > > Fabio Maulo > > > > -- > > Fabio Maulo > -- Fabio Maulo
