If I may chip in, moving to a DVCS is not just about moving the code to another repository. It's also about people being able to fork easily and everyone on the project network being able to see what everyone else is working on. Github and Bitbucket were built from the ground up around these concepts. I might be wrong but I don't see any fork button or fork list on Sourceforge projects using git (e.g. https://sourceforge.net/projects/gitextensions/ ). I couldn't find any projects using a mercurial repository on sourceforge. It looks as if DVCS was bolted on as an afterthought. Without this fork management thing, a huge part of DVCS is lost.
-- Mauricio On Jun 4, 11:14 am, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote: > SourceForge gives support to any thing we want and, over all, SourceForge is > one of the most important and historical piece of OSS world. > We have no strong reason to move NH sources somewhere else (at least so > far). > > On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Lorenzo Melato > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > Have you evaluated bitbucket.org as Mercurial hosting ? > > > -- > > Lorenzo Melato > >http://blogs.ynnova.it/lorenzomelato > > -- > Fabio Maulo
