Making the switch from Alpha to Beta is typically done when you hit feature-freeze on development. If all you are doing is quashing bugs, then you're probably in beta phase. Either way, it's up to you guys to figure out your release practices.
So, since the next release will continue to be alpha, this implies there will be some additional Beta phases afterwards. What is the scheduled ETA for delivery of NH3? On Aug 20, 3:36 pm, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote: > Ok. > Will be Alpha3 > > On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Diego Mijelshon > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > Why not call that one "Beta1"? > > It's just a name but, as said, people give a different meaning to it. > > > And we have something to do with LINQ indeed... but it works in 90% of the > > cases :-) > > > Diego > > > On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 16:03, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> We will do it when will be the moment. > >> The next release will be Alpha3... we have to do something with the LINQ > >> provider, no ? > > >> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Diego Mijelshon > >> <[email protected]>wrote: > > >>> Considering NH3 is pretty stable AND the fact that the team's OK with it > >>> being used in production, shouldn't the "alpha" tag be changed to "beta" > >>> or > >>> "RC"? > >>> For most people, it carries a meaning that is NOT the one NH gives to it, > >>> and that impedance forces us to constantly tell people to ignore that > >>> label. > > >>> Diego > > >> -- > >> Fabio Maulo > > -- > Fabio Maulo
