When we considerer that it is ready for BetaX, CR_X and GA we will release it (as usual in OSS without a commercial company behind).
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Matt <[email protected]> wrote: > Making the switch from Alpha to Beta is typically done when you hit > feature-freeze on development. If all you are doing is quashing bugs, > then you're probably in beta phase. Either way, it's up to you guys to > figure out your release practices. > > So, since the next release will continue to be alpha, this implies > there will be some additional Beta phases afterwards. What is the > scheduled ETA for delivery of NH3? > > On Aug 20, 3:36 pm, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote: > > Ok. > > Will be Alpha3 > > > > On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Diego Mijelshon <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > Why not call that one "Beta1"? > > > It's just a name but, as said, people give a different meaning to it. > > > > > And we have something to do with LINQ indeed... but it works in 90% of > the > > > cases :-) > > > > > Diego > > > > > On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 16:03, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > >> We will do it when will be the moment. > > >> The next release will be Alpha3... we have to do something with the > LINQ > > >> provider, no ? > > > > >> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Diego Mijelshon < > [email protected]>wrote: > > > > >>> Considering NH3 is pretty stable AND the fact that the team's OK with > it > > >>> being used in production, shouldn't the "alpha" tag be changed to > "beta" or > > >>> "RC"? > > >>> For most people, it carries a meaning that is NOT the one NH gives to > it, > > >>> and that impedance forces us to constantly tell people to ignore that > label. > > > > >>> Diego > > > > >> -- > > >> Fabio Maulo > > > > -- > > Fabio Maulo > -- Fabio Maulo
